Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Mandle Lee Martin
Date: 01-15-2025
Case Number:
Judge: Not Available
Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee (Davidson County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Nashville
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Nashville Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Click Here For The Best Nashville Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Nashville, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm and ammunition.
FBI agents arrested Martin for receiving and possessing ammunition as a convicted felon.
Between his May 2018 arrest and his December 2022 guilty plea, Martin's behavior caused his
counsel and the district court to question his mental competence. At counsel's request, the district
court twice ordered psychological evaluations of Martin—once in 2018 and again in 2021. Both
evaluations concluded that Martin could understand the nature of the criminal proceedings, and
both opined that at least some of Martin's lack of cooperation in his legal proceedings appeared to
be volitional. After each evaluation, the district court held a competency hearing, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 4241, and concluded that Martin was competent to proceed.
Martin ultimately pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to one count of receipt and
possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. The district court found Martin "competent to
enter a plea of guilty†and accepted the plea. Before sentencing, Martin's counsel filed a
sentencing memorandum stating that, although he believed that Martin's mental health had
"seriously deteriorated†since the change-of-plea hearing, he knew of "no legal authority for a
further competency hearing after the defendant has entered a guilty plea and is awaiting
sentencing.â€
At sentencing, the district court calculated Martin's Guidelines range at 140–175 months.
And after considering Martin's mental health as a mitigating factor, the district court sentenced
Martin to a below-Guidelines sentence of 130 months' incarceration. The court recommended that
the Bureau of Prisons place Martin in a federal medical facility so that he could receive mental-
health treatment. This appeal followed.
Wh
FBI agents arrested Martin for receiving and possessing ammunition as a convicted felon.
Between his May 2018 arrest and his December 2022 guilty plea, Martin's behavior caused his
counsel and the district court to question his mental competence. At counsel's request, the district
court twice ordered psychological evaluations of Martin—once in 2018 and again in 2021. Both
evaluations concluded that Martin could understand the nature of the criminal proceedings, and
both opined that at least some of Martin's lack of cooperation in his legal proceedings appeared to
be volitional. After each evaluation, the district court held a competency hearing, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 4241, and concluded that Martin was competent to proceed.
Martin ultimately pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to one count of receipt and
possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. The district court found Martin "competent to
enter a plea of guilty†and accepted the plea. Before sentencing, Martin's counsel filed a
sentencing memorandum stating that, although he believed that Martin's mental health had
"seriously deteriorated†since the change-of-plea hearing, he knew of "no legal authority for a
further competency hearing after the defendant has entered a guilty plea and is awaiting
sentencing.â€
At sentencing, the district court calculated Martin's Guidelines range at 140–175 months.
And after considering Martin's mental health as a mitigating factor, the district court sentenced
Martin to a below-Guidelines sentence of 130 months' incarceration. The court recommended that
the Bureau of Prisons place Martin in a federal medical facility so that he could receive mental-
health treatment. This appeal followed.
Wh
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Mandle Lee Martin?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard United States of America v. Mandle Lee Martin?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee (Davidson County), TN. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Mandle Lee Martin?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Nashville. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Nashville Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Mandle Lee Martin decided?
This case was decided on January 15, 2025.