Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of South Dakota v. Edward Clay
Date: 01-12-2026
Case Number:
Judge: Not Available
Court: Circuit Court, Mead County, South Dakota
Plaintiff's Attorney: Mead County, South Dakota, State's Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Sturgis Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Sturgis, South Dakota, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with aggravated assault, grand theft, and possession of a stolen vehicle.
Edward Clay, age 40, of Rapid City, accused of attempting to seat a 2025 ford pickup truck.
Edward Clay, age 40, of Rapid City, accused of attempting to seat a 2025 ford pickup truck.
Outcome:
A criminal charge is not proof of guilt.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of South Dakota v. Edward Clay?
The outcome was: A criminal charge is not proof of guilt.
Which court heard State of South Dakota v. Edward Clay?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Mead County, South Dakota, SD. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in State of South Dakota v. Edward Clay?
Plaintiff's attorney: Mead County, South Dakota, State's Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Sturgis Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was State of South Dakota v. Edward Clay decided?
This case was decided on January 12, 2026.