Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Dr. Jian Yun Dong, aka John Dong, GenPhar Inc. and Vaxima Inc.

Date: 08-04-2015

Case Number:

Judge:

Court: United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (Richland County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Eric Klumb and Nathan Williams

Defendant's Attorney: Chris Adams and Rose Mary Parham for Jian-Yun Dong



Wells Dickson for GenPhar, Inc. and



Description:
Columbia, SC - Dr. Dong, GenPhar Inc., and Vaxima, Inc., Convicted of Fraud in Retrial Before U.S. District Court Judge David Norton



Dr. Jian Yun Dong, aka John Dong, and the companies which he founded, GenPhar Inc. and Vaxima Inc., were convicted of multiple fraud-based charges following a five day trial in Federal Court that took place June 22 through 25, 2015. The case was submitted for decision to Judge David C. Norton, who issued the verdicts and a written decision today. The case was retried before Judge Norton after a jury hearing the case last November could not reach unanimous verdicts on all counts, although it did find the two corporate defendants guilty of most of the charges. After the two trials, all three defendants have been found guilty of one count of Conspiracy to Commit Grant Fraud, Wire Fraud, Theft of Government Property and Providing False Statements; one count of Theft of Government Funds; and 22 counts of Wire Fraud.



The trial began on November 5, 2014, and concluded on November 14, 2014. Testimony at trial established that federal grant money was obtained by GenPhar and Vaxima for purposes of biodefense research and vaccine development, but was used for other purposes, specifically to construct a commercial office building and pay lobbyists and others who were seeking to secure federal funding for the defendants. Testimony further established that a total of approximately six million dollars were spent on the construction, which included approximately at least three million dollars of improperly diverted grant money.



Mr. Nettles stated, “The real tragedy in this case is that millions of dollars intended for desperately needed vaccine research was diverted into a commercial real estate project. Most of the dedicated and accomplished scientists receiving these grants can be trusted to spend the funds on research, but those that seek to divert the funds to their own benefit need to know that we will pursue charges against them like any other fraudsters.”



The convictions are the result of an investigation conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service.

Outcome:
See above
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Dr. Jian Yun Dong, aka John D...?

The outcome was: See above

Which court heard United States of America v. Dr. Jian Yun Dong, aka John D...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (Richland County), SC.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Dr. Jian Yun Dong, aka John D...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Eric Klumb and Nathan Williams. Defendant's attorney: Chris Adams and Rose Mary Parham for Jian-Yun Dong Wells Dickson for GenPhar, Inc. and.

When was United States of America v. Dr. Jian Yun Dong, aka John D... decided?

This case was decided on August 4, 2015.