Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Margaret Ward Heilman; Katherine Ward Gray
Date: 12-05-2024
Case Number:
Judge: Joseph Dawson, III
Court: The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
Plaintiff's Attorney: The States United Attorney’s Office for Florence
Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Florence, South Carolina Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
font >
Florence, South Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with
Defendants were found guilty and sentenced Heilman to 20 months imprisonment, to be followed by a three-year term of court-ordered supervision. Heilman was also ordered to pay $1.5 million in restitution
Gray was sentenced to seven months in imprisonment, to be followed by a three-year term of court-ordered supervision. Gray was ordered to pay $234,131.82 in restitution.
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Margaret Ward Heilman; Kather...?
The outcome was: Defendants were found guilty and sentenced Heilman to 20 months imprisonment, to be followed by a three-year term of court-ordered supervision. Heilman was also ordered to pay $1.5 million in restitution Gray was sentenced to seven months in imprisonment, to be followed by a three-year term of court-ordered supervision. Gray was ordered to pay $234,131.82 in restitution.
Which court heard United States of America v. Margaret Ward Heilman; Kather...?
This case was heard in The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, SC. The presiding judge was Joseph Dawson, III.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Margaret Ward Heilman; Kather...?
Plaintiff's attorney: The States United Attorney’s Office for Florence. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Florence, South Carolina Criminal Defense Lawyer Directoryfont >.
When was United States of America v. Margaret Ward Heilman; Kather... decided?
This case was decided on December 5, 2024.