Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Nesbett H. Johnson, Jr. v. Jean's Team Logistics LLC, et al.

Date: 02-13-2024

Case Number: 0:23-cv-01016

Judge: Joseph F Anderson, Jr.

Court: United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (York County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:





Click Here For The Best Rock Hill Personal Injury Lawyer Directory







Defendant's Attorney: Rock Hill, South Carolina insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant.

Description:
Rock Hill, South Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.



This case was filed in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, 2023-CP-12-00086, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.



Some states subscribe to the "pure comparative negligence” rule, where a plaintiff can recover damages even if he or she was 99 percent at-fault. But South Carolina follows the "modified comparative negligence” rule, with a 51 percent bar. Here, the plaintiff's fault must only be 50 percent or less.



Outcome:
Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Nesbett H. Johnson, Jr. v. Jean's Team Logistics LLC, et al.?

The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Which court heard Nesbett H. Johnson, Jr. v. Jean's Team Logistics LLC, et al.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (York County), SC. The presiding judge was Joseph F Anderson, Jr..

Who were the attorneys in Nesbett H. Johnson, Jr. v. Jean's Team Logistics LLC, et al.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Rock Hill Personal Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Rock Hill, South Carolina insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant..

When was Nesbett H. Johnson, Jr. v. Jean's Team Logistics LLC, et al. decided?

This case was decided on February 13, 2024.