Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Victoria Wells v. BMW of North America, L.L.C.

Date: 11-08-2021

Case Number: 4:20-cv-03209-JD

Judge: Joseph Dawson, III

Court: United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (Florence County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Best Florence Personal Injury Lawyer Directory

Defendant's Attorney: Sarah Dora Specter, Andrew Marvin Connor, Elle Elizabeth Klein

Description:

Florence, South Carolina personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

Outcome:

11/08/2021 45 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by the Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 11/8/2021. (lgib, ) (Entered: 11/09/2021)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Victoria Wells v. BMW of North America, L.L.C.?

The outcome was: 11/08/2021 45 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by the Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 11/8/2021. (lgib, ) (Entered: 11/09/2021)

Which court heard Victoria Wells v. BMW of North America, L.L.C.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (Florence County), SC. The presiding judge was Joseph Dawson, III.

Who were the attorneys in Victoria Wells v. BMW of North America, L.L.C.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Best Florence Personal Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Sarah Dora Specter, Andrew Marvin Connor, Elle Elizabeth Klein.

When was Victoria Wells v. BMW of North America, L.L.C. decided?

This case was decided on November 8, 2021.