Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Metaltec Corporation v. Garland Inductries, Inc.

Date: 10-22-1999

Case Number: 98-163-A

Judge: Silverstein

Court: Superior Court, Kent County, Rhode Island

Plaintiff's Attorney: Robert S. Bruzzi, Providence, Rhode Island

Defendant's Attorney: Eugene F. Toro, East Greenwich, Rhode Island

Description:
Defective goods - On May 11, 1990, Metaltec, a New Jersey corporation, filed a
complaint seeking $72,808.64 with intrest on a book account and
for goods sold and delivered to defendant, Garland Industries
Inc., a Rhode Island corporation. The defendant filed an answer
and counterclaim, asserting that the goods, component parts used
in the manufacture of pens, were defective. The defendant sought
damages for the expenses it incurred in using the defective
components. The matter was tried before a justice and jury of the
Superior Court.

Outcome:
At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned
a verdict for the defendant on its counterclaim in the amount of
$128,815.42 plus interest. The judgment was subsequently amended
to $76,523.42 by remittitur.



Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
Affirmed by the Supreme Court of Rhode Island. See: ___ A.2d ___ (R.I. 1999). Note: The above date reflects the appellate court decision date, not the original trial date. Reported by kkm.

About This Case

What was the outcome of Metaltec Corporation v. Garland Inductries, Inc.?

The outcome was: At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant on its counterclaim in the amount of $128,815.42 plus interest. The judgment was subsequently amended to $76,523.42 by remittitur.

Which court heard Metaltec Corporation v. Garland Inductries, Inc.?

This case was heard in Superior Court, Kent County, Rhode Island, RI. The presiding judge was Silverstein.

Who were the attorneys in Metaltec Corporation v. Garland Inductries, Inc.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Robert S. Bruzzi, Providence, Rhode Island. Defendant's attorney: Eugene F. Toro, East Greenwich, Rhode Island.

When was Metaltec Corporation v. Garland Inductries, Inc. decided?

This case was decided on October 22, 1999.