Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Metaltec Corporation v. Garland Inductries, Inc.
Date: 10-22-1999
Case Number: 98-163-A
Judge: Silverstein
Court: Superior Court, Kent County, Rhode Island
Plaintiff's Attorney: Robert S. Bruzzi, Providence, Rhode Island
Defendant's Attorney: Eugene F. Toro, East Greenwich, Rhode Island
complaint seeking $72,808.64 with intrest on a book account and
for goods sold and delivered to defendant, Garland Industries
Inc., a Rhode Island corporation. The defendant filed an answer
and counterclaim, asserting that the goods, component parts used
in the manufacture of pens, were defective. The defendant sought
damages for the expenses it incurred in using the defective
components. The matter was tried before a justice and jury of the
Superior Court.
a verdict for the defendant on its counterclaim in the amount of
$128,815.42 plus interest. The judgment was subsequently amended
to $76,523.42 by remittitur.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Metaltec Corporation v. Garland Inductries, Inc.?
The outcome was: At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant on its counterclaim in the amount of $128,815.42 plus interest. The judgment was subsequently amended to $76,523.42 by remittitur.
Which court heard Metaltec Corporation v. Garland Inductries, Inc.?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Kent County, Rhode Island, RI. The presiding judge was Silverstein.
Who were the attorneys in Metaltec Corporation v. Garland Inductries, Inc.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Robert S. Bruzzi, Providence, Rhode Island. Defendant's attorney: Eugene F. Toro, East Greenwich, Rhode Island.
When was Metaltec Corporation v. Garland Inductries, Inc. decided?
This case was decided on October 22, 1999.