Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Jeffry Cintron v. Paul Bibeault, et al.
Date: 08-21-2025
Case Number:
Judge:
Court: United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island (Providence County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Providence Personal Injury Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Rhode Island Attorney General's Office
Description:
Providence, Rhode Island personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory.
In July 2019, Jerry Cintron overdosed on a fentanyl-laced pill while in Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RIDOC) custody. For his alleged role in acquiring, possessing, and consuming the pill, RIDOC sanctioned Cintron with 450 days in solitary confinement. While so confined, Cintron allegedly experienced severe mental and physical deterioration, stemming from the conditions of confinement that characterized his stint in solitary.
Relying on 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Cintron sued eight current and former RIDOC officials ("defendants"), accusing them of
violating his Eighth Amendment "right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment by deliberately and recklessly placing him at substantial risk of serious harm." He alleges, among other things, that defendants deliberately responded indifferently to his suffering by continuing his punitive solitary confinement even as his physical and mental deterioration went untreated. Defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings, arguing, among other things, that Cintron's claim failed on its merits and that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity from his § 1983 claim for damages.
In July 2019, Jerry Cintron overdosed on a fentanyl-laced pill while in Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RIDOC) custody. For his alleged role in acquiring, possessing, and consuming the pill, RIDOC sanctioned Cintron with 450 days in solitary confinement. While so confined, Cintron allegedly experienced severe mental and physical deterioration, stemming from the conditions of confinement that characterized his stint in solitary.
Relying on 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Cintron sued eight current and former RIDOC officials ("defendants"), accusing them of
violating his Eighth Amendment "right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment by deliberately and recklessly placing him at substantial risk of serious harm." He alleges, among other things, that defendants deliberately responded indifferently to his suffering by continuing his punitive solitary confinement even as his physical and mental deterioration went untreated. Defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings, arguing, among other things, that Cintron's claim failed on its merits and that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity from his § 1983 claim for damages.
Outcome:
Defendants' motion for summary judgment granted.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Jeffry Cintron v. Paul Bibeault, et al.?
The outcome was: Defendants' motion for summary judgment granted. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Which court heard Jeffry Cintron v. Paul Bibeault, et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island (Providence County), RI.
Who were the attorneys in Jeffry Cintron v. Paul Bibeault, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Providence Personal Injury Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Rhode Island Attorney General's Office.
When was Jeffry Cintron v. Paul Bibeault, et al. decided?
This case was decided on August 21, 2025.