Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Richard Lee Paiva v. Patricia Anne Coyne-Fague

Date: 07-25-2022

Case Number: 21-1746

Judge: Barron

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on appeal from the District of Rhode Island (Providence County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:









Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan



Click Here For The Best Providence Civil Rights Lawyer Directory





Defendant's Attorney: Ian P. Anderson

Description:
Providence, Rhode Island civil rights lawyer represented Plaitiff, who sued Defendant on a 1983 civil rights violation theory.



Richard Lee Paiva, who is serving

a life sentence in a Rhode Island state prison, challenges the

dismissal of the claims that he brought in the United States

District Court for the District of Rhode Island pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983 against the Rhode Island Department of Corrections

("Department") and its Director. Paiva alleges in these claims

that Department officials made deductions from his inmate account

as a charge for copies of documents that he requested and that, in

consequence, the defendants violated his federal constitutional

rights.
Outcome:
We affirm.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Richard Lee Paiva v. Patricia Anne Coyne-Fague?

The outcome was: We affirm.

Which court heard Richard Lee Paiva v. Patricia Anne Coyne-Fague?

This case was heard in United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on appeal from the District of Rhode Island (Providence County), RI. The presiding judge was Barron.

Who were the attorneys in Richard Lee Paiva v. Patricia Anne Coyne-Fague?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Providence Civil Rights Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Ian P. Anderson.

When was Richard Lee Paiva v. Patricia Anne Coyne-Fague decided?

This case was decided on July 25, 2022.