Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. David Dupree
Date: 11-19-2025
Case Number: 08-CR-170
Judge: Yvette Kane
Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Dauphin County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Harrisburg
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Harrisburg Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant seeking compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).
In 2009, after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Dupree was convicted of armed bank robbery, use of a firearm during a crime of violence, and conspiracy to commit robbery. The District Court sentenced Dupree to an aggregate term of 332 months' incarceration plus three years of supervised release. Dupree has since filed four motions under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) for compassionate release, all of which have been denied by the District Court.
* * *
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) is the federal statute that allows a court to reduce a term of imprisonment for "extraordinary and compelling reasons".
To be eligible, a defendant must show that a reduction is warranted after considering the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and that it is consistent with the Sentencing Commission's policy statements. This process is commonly known as "compassionate release".
Purpose: The statute grants a court the authority to modify a sentence of imprisonment.
Criteria for a reduction:
There must be "extraordinary and compelling" reasons for the reduction.
The reduction must be consistent with the sentencing factors outlined in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
The reduction must align with the Sentencing Commission's policy statements (specifically, § 1B1.13).
Procedural requirement: A defendant must first file a motion with the court, typically after they have exhausted administrative remedies by asking the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to file the motion on their behalf.
Examples of "extraordinary and compelling" reasons:
Terminal illness
Serious medical condition
Age-related factors
Other reasons such as a change in the law that makes the sentence inequitable, according to a DOJ statement
Key takeaway: This statute provides a mechanism for an inmate to seek a sentence reduction, but the process is strict and requires meeting specific criteria before a judge will consider the motion.
In 2009, after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Dupree was convicted of armed bank robbery, use of a firearm during a crime of violence, and conspiracy to commit robbery. The District Court sentenced Dupree to an aggregate term of 332 months' incarceration plus three years of supervised release. Dupree has since filed four motions under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) for compassionate release, all of which have been denied by the District Court.
* * *
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) is the federal statute that allows a court to reduce a term of imprisonment for "extraordinary and compelling reasons".
To be eligible, a defendant must show that a reduction is warranted after considering the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and that it is consistent with the Sentencing Commission's policy statements. This process is commonly known as "compassionate release".
Purpose: The statute grants a court the authority to modify a sentence of imprisonment.
Criteria for a reduction:
There must be "extraordinary and compelling" reasons for the reduction.
The reduction must be consistent with the sentencing factors outlined in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
The reduction must align with the Sentencing Commission's policy statements (specifically, § 1B1.13).
Procedural requirement: A defendant must first file a motion with the court, typically after they have exhausted administrative remedies by asking the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to file the motion on their behalf.
Examples of "extraordinary and compelling" reasons:
Terminal illness
Serious medical condition
Age-related factors
Other reasons such as a change in the law that makes the sentence inequitable, according to a DOJ statement
Key takeaway: This statute provides a mechanism for an inmate to seek a sentence reduction, but the process is strict and requires meeting specific criteria before a judge will consider the motion.
Outcome:
Motion denied.
Affirmed
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. David Dupree?
The outcome was: Motion denied. Affirmed
Which court heard United States of America v. David Dupree?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Dauphin County), PA. The presiding judge was Yvette Kane.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. David Dupree?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Harrisburg. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Harrisburg Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. David Dupree decided?
This case was decided on November 19, 2025.