Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Justis Shea

Date: 08-28-2025

Case Number: 24-CR-180

Judge: Julia K. Mumley

Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Lackawanna County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Scranton

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Scranton Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Scranton, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm and drug trafficking.
Outcome:
The defendant was sentenced to a term of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY (130) MONTHS, including 130 months on each of counts 2 and 6 to run concurrently; Supervised release of THREE (3) YEARS on each count to run concurrently; Dft does not have the ability to pay a fine; Total Special assessment of $200, due immediately; Appeal rights given; Dft remanded to USM
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Justis Shea?

The outcome was: The defendant was sentenced to a term of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY (130) MONTHS, including 130 months on each of counts 2 and 6 to run concurrently; Supervised release of THREE (3) YEARS on each count to run concurrently; Dft does not have the ability to pay a fine; Total Special assessment of $200, due immediately; Appeal rights given; Dft remanded to USM

Which court heard United States of America v. Justis Shea?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Lackawanna County), PA. The presiding judge was Julia K. Mumley.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Justis Shea?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Scranton. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Scranton Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Justis Shea decided?

This case was decided on August 28, 2025.