Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Zoe Hollis v. R& R Restaurants, Inc., et al.
Date: 11-18-2025
Case Number: 21-CV-965
Judge: Michael H. Simon
Court: United States District Court for the District Oregon (Multnomah County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Portland Employment Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Portland Commercial Litigation Lawyer Directory
Description:
Portland, Oregon employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory.
Zoe Hollis, a dancer at a Portland strip club called Sassy's, sued the club's owners and managers under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("the FLSA†or "the Actâ€) for misclassifying its dancers as independent contractors and violating corresponding wage and hour provisions. After Hollis filed the complaint, Frank Faillace—a partner and manager of both Sassy's and another club called Dante's—canceled an agreement for Hollis to perform at a weekly variety show at Dante's. In emailing Hollis to cancel her performance, Faillace cited the suit against Sassy's,
explaining his intent to protect Dante's from legal liability. After receiving Faillace's email, Hollis amended the
complaint to allege that Faillace's decision to bar Hollis from performing at Dante's constituted retaliation in
violation of the FLSA.
Zoe Hollis, a dancer at a Portland strip club called Sassy's, sued the club's owners and managers under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("the FLSA†or "the Actâ€) for misclassifying its dancers as independent contractors and violating corresponding wage and hour provisions. After Hollis filed the complaint, Frank Faillace—a partner and manager of both Sassy's and another club called Dante's—canceled an agreement for Hollis to perform at a weekly variety show at Dante's. In emailing Hollis to cancel her performance, Faillace cited the suit against Sassy's,
explaining his intent to protect Dante's from legal liability. After receiving Faillace's email, Hollis amended the
complaint to allege that Faillace's decision to bar Hollis from performing at Dante's constituted retaliation in
violation of the FLSA.
Outcome:
Summary judgment in favor of the Defendants granted.
Reversed.
Reversed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Zoe Hollis v. R& R Restaurants, Inc., et al.?
The outcome was: Summary judgment in favor of the Defendants granted. Reversed.
Which court heard Zoe Hollis v. R& R Restaurants, Inc., et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District Oregon (Multnomah County), OR. The presiding judge was Michael H. Simon.
Who were the attorneys in Zoe Hollis v. R& R Restaurants, Inc., et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Portland Employment Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Portland Commercial Litigation Lawyer Directory.
When was Zoe Hollis v. R& R Restaurants, Inc., et al. decided?
This case was decided on November 18, 2025.