Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Oklahoma v. Henry Dean Feeken
Date: 03-17-2016
Case Number: 2016 OK CR 6
Judge: Smith
Court: Oklahoma Court of Appeals on appeal from the District Court, Caddo County
Plaintiff's Attorney: Caddo County District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Motion to suppress obtained by a search.
The state appealed:
PROPOSITION I. The officers had reasonable suspicion and probable cause pursuant to Illinois v. Gates and Florida v. Harris to deploy the certified, drug sniffing dog during a "non-traffic related" encounter with defendant.
PROPOSITION II. Appellee was never illegally detained since the deputy's initial, reasonable suspicion for the investigatory encounter had not ceased despite discovering that the motorcycle had no insurance coverage required by the compulsory insurance law of Oklahoma.
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Oklahoma v. Henry Dean Feeken?
The outcome was: Reversed and remanded.
Which court heard State of Oklahoma v. Henry Dean Feeken?
This case was heard in Oklahoma Court of Appeals on appeal from the District Court, Caddo County, OK. The presiding judge was Smith.
Who were the attorneys in State of Oklahoma v. Henry Dean Feeken?
Plaintiff's attorney: Caddo County District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Anardarko Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer..
When was State of Oklahoma v. Henry Dean Feeken decided?
This case was decided on March 17, 2016.