Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. James Strahler, II

Date: 09-14-2026

Case Number: 2:26-cr-00038

Judge: Sarah D. Morrison

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Franklin County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Emily Czerniejewski

Defendant's Attorney: Todd Long

Description:
Columbus, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with threatening interstate domestic violence, making obscene or harassing telephone calls, and selling or transferring obscene matter. in violation of 18 U.S.C.1466, 18 U.S.C.1462, 18 U.S.C. 2252A, 18 U.S.C. 2261, 18 U.S.C. 875D, and 47 U.S.C. 223A.

Reported by Kent Morlan

James Strahler II, 37, of Columbus,installed more than 24 AI platforms and more than 100 AI web-based models on his phone. The defendant used telephone calls, voicemails, text messages and web postings to engage in a campaign of harassment against his victims.

From December 2024 until June 2025, Strahler sent harassing messages to at least six adult female victims. These messages included nude images of the victims, both real and AI-generated.

For example, Strahler used AI to create pornographic videos depicting at least one adult victim engaged in sex acts with her father. He then distributed those videos to the victim’s co-workers. He also messaged the mothers of the adult females and demanded nude photos of them, threatening to circulate explicit or obscene images he created of their daughters if they did not comply. He often called the victims and left voicemails of him masturbating or threatening rape. He referred to the victims’ specific home addresses in his threats.

Strahler also posted online AI-generated obscenities he created of children. He generated these files using the faces of minor boys from his community. He then morphed the face of the minor boys onto the bodies of other adults or children and created videos that depicted the boys engaged in sex acts. Strahler specifically created AI-generated obscenity of the minor boys having sex with their mothers and/or grandmothers.

Strahler created more than 700 images of both real victims and animated persons and posted them to a website dedicated to child sexual abuse. An additional 2,400 images and videos on his phone were flagged as depicting nudity, morphed child sexual abuse material or violence.

Strahler’s criminal conduct was first reported to the Hilliard Police Department and the Delaware County Sheriff’s Office before being referred to the FBI. He was arrested on federal charges in June 2025.
Outcome:
The Defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to 180 months in prison.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. James Strahler, II?

The outcome was: The Defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to 180 months in prison.

Which court heard United States of America v. James Strahler, II?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Franklin County), OH. The presiding judge was Sarah D. Morrison.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. James Strahler, II?

Plaintiff's attorney: Emily Czerniejewski. Defendant's attorney: Todd Long.

When was United States of America v. James Strahler, II decided?

This case was decided on September 14, 2026.