Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Richard Roman

Date: 11-14-2025

Case Number: 14-CR-43

Judge: Algenon L. Marbley

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Franklin County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Columbus

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Columbus Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Columbus, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with coercion or enticement of a female.
Outcome:
One Hundred Forty-Four (144) months incarceration; Twenty (20) Years supr rel; No fine imposed; $100 spec assessment.



Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Algenon L Marbley:

Final Hearing re Revocation of Supervised Release as to Richard Roman held on 11/14/2025. The Court finds that no violation of the terms of Supervised Release has occurred.Defendant is continued on the current term of supervision with the same previously imposed conditions. In addition, the terms of Mr. Romans supervision are modified to include the following special conditions:(1) The defendant shall have no contact with any minors with the exception of the defendants own children or grandchildren. The defendants contact with his grandchildren shall be supervised by a person approved by the probation officer who is aware of his offense conduct. The term contact extends to all forms of communication such as email, telephone, text, letter, and any other form of electronic communication. This provision does not encompass persons under age 18 such as ticket vendors, cashiers, or waiters with whom the defendant must deal with in order to obtain normal commercial services. The defendant shall be prohibited from loitering where minors congregate, such as, but not limited to, playgrounds, arcades, amusement parks, recreation parks, sportsevents involving minors, shopping malls, and public swimming pools; (2) The defendant shall not view, access, or possess any material, image, audio, video or digital matter containing or portraying sexually explicit conduct as defined by 18 U.S.C. §§ 2256(2)(A) and (B); and (3) In consideration of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(3), the defendant shall submit and/or surrender any media device, to which they have access and/or control, to a search based on reasonable suspicion of contraband or evidence of a violation of a condition of supervision. A media device is defined as, but not limited to, any device which is capable of accessing internet, storing images, text, or other forms of electronic communication. (Court Reporter: Shawna Evans) (sh2) (Entered: 11/14/2025)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Richard Roman?

The outcome was: One Hundred Forty-Four (144) months incarceration; Twenty (20) Years supr rel; No fine imposed; $100 spec assessment. Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Algenon L Marbley: Final Hearing re Revocation of Supervised Release as to Richard Roman held on 11/14/2025. The Court finds that no violation of the terms of Supervised Release has occurred.Defendant is continued on the current term of supervision with the same previously imposed conditions. In addition, the terms of Mr. Romans supervision are modified to include the following special conditions:(1) The defendant shall have no contact with any minors with the exception of the defendants own children or grandchildren. The defendants contact with his grandchildren shall be supervised by a person approved by the probation officer who is aware of his offense conduct. The term contact extends to all forms of communication such as email, telephone, text, letter, and any other form of electronic communication. This provision does not encompass persons under age 18 such as ticket vendors, cashiers, or waiters with whom the defendant must deal with in order to obtain normal commercial services. The defendant shall be prohibited from loitering where minors congregate, such as, but not limited to, playgrounds, arcades, amusement parks, recreation parks, sportsevents involving minors, shopping malls, and public swimming pools; (2) The defendant shall not view, access, or possess any material, image, audio, video or digital matter containing or portraying sexually explicit conduct as defined by 18 U.S.C. §§ 2256(2)(A) and (B); and (3) In consideration of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(3), the defendant shall submit and/or surrender any media device, to which they have access and/or control, to a search based on reasonable suspicion of contraband or evidence of a violation of a condition of supervision. A media device is defined as, but not limited to, any device which is capable of accessing internet, storing images, text, or other forms of electronic communication. (Court Reporter: Shawna Evans) (sh2) (Entered: 11/14/2025)

Which court heard United States of America v. Richard Roman?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Franklin County), OH. The presiding judge was Algenon L. Marbley.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Richard Roman?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Columbus. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Columbus Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Richard Roman decided?

This case was decided on November 14, 2025.