Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Steevenson Persona

Date: 10-24-2025

Case Number: 25-CR-55

Judge: Michael J. Newman

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Montgomery County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Dayton

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Dayton Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Dayton, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud.



Google A.I.:



Federal wire fraud law, defined by 18 U.S.C. § 1343, makes it a crime to use electronic communications across state lines to execute a scheme to defraud someone of money, property, or honest services. To secure a conviction, a prosecutor must prove the defendant engaged in a scheme to defraud, used material misrepresentations, intentionally used interstate wire communications (like the internet or phone) to further the scheme, and that interstate wire communications were in fact used. Penalties can include up to 20 years in prison and fines, or up to 30 years if the fraud involves a federal disaster or a financial institution.

Elements of wire fraud



Scheme to defraud:

The defendant must have had a plan to cheat someone out of money or property through deceit.



Intent to defraud:



The defendant must have had the specific intent to deceive and defraud, not just to make a mistake.

Use of interstate wire communications:



The scheme must involve the use of electronic communications, such as the internet, phone, radio, or television, that cross state or international lines.



Material misrepresentation or omission:



The scheme must have involved false statements or a failure to disclose important facts that could influence the victim.



Examples of wire fraud



Online schemes to steal credit card information

Promises of a large return for a smaller investment, often involving overseas bank transfers

Manipulating stock prices through fraudulent online activities

Phishing scams that use emails to steal personal and financial information



Penalties



Standard: Up to 20 years in prison and/or fines.



Enhanced: Up to 30 years in prison if the fraud is related to a federally declared disaster or affects a financial institution.



Individuals: Can be fined up to $1,000,000 for certain offenses.

Organizations: Can be fined up to $500,000.

Outcome:
Defendant sentenced to Time Served plus One Day on Count 1. Restitution of $20,916.49 ordered. Fine of $2000 waived. Special Assessment of $100 due immediately. Defendants rights of appeal explained and understood.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Steevenson Persona?

The outcome was: Defendant sentenced to Time Served plus One Day on Count 1. Restitution of $20,916.49 ordered. Fine of $2000 waived. Special Assessment of $100 due immediately. Defendants rights of appeal explained and understood.

Which court heard United States of America v. Steevenson Persona?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Montgomery County), OH. The presiding judge was Michael J. Newman.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Steevenson Persona?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Dayton. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Dayton Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Steevenson Persona decided?

This case was decided on October 24, 2025.