Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Juan A. Otero, III

Date: 09-25-2025

Case Number: 22-cr-00425

Judge: Pamela A. Barker

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Summit County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Akron

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Akron Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Akron, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with ne count of felon-in-possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and three counts of possessing with the intent to distribute a controlled substance, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1).



On two separate occasions, police officers waited for Juan Otero to leave a residence, pulled him over nearby during a traffic stop, and brought him back to the residence. Once back, officers executed a search warrant of the residence

and interviewed Otero. Otero then made incriminating statements—some of which were not Mirandized: during the first search, Otero said that a gun in the master bedroom belonged to him; during the second search, he said that the drugs stashed in the backyard were given to him to sell. A grand jury indicted Otero with one count of felon-in-possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and three counts of possessing with the intent to distribute a controlled substance, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1). Before trial, Otero moved to suppress the statements made during the second search, arguing that the interview did not occur and that the police report recording the interview was unreliable. He did not seek to suppress the statements made during the first search. The district court denied the motion, finding that Otero's motion raised a credibility issue, not a suppression issue, that should be decided by the jury at trial.

Outcome:
The jury then found Otero guilty of all the charges.



Custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of 300 months on each of Counts 1 and 2, and 240 months in Count 3 in, all such terms to run concurrently to each other and Case No. 5:21-cr-00710-PAB-1. Supervised Release for a term of 5 years, with conditions; Fine waived; Special Assessment $100.



Affirmed

Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Juan A. Otero, III?

The outcome was: The jury then found Otero guilty of all the charges. Custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of 300 months on each of Counts 1 and 2, and 240 months in Count 3 in, all such terms to run concurrently to each other and Case No. 5:21-cr-00710-PAB-1. Supervised Release for a term of 5 years, with conditions; Fine waived; Special Assessment $100. Affirmed

Which court heard United States of America v. Juan A. Otero, III?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Summit County), OH. The presiding judge was Pamela A. Barker.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Juan A. Otero, III?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Akron. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Akron Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Juan A. Otero, III decided?

This case was decided on September 25, 2025.