Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Cristina Burcica v. Natalie Ludy
Date: 12-27-2024
Case Number: A-1804264
Judge: Not Available
Court: Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County, Ohio
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Cincinnati Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: John Mulvey
Description:
Cincinnati, Ohio personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence exposure to lead.
An ordinary landlord-tenant relationship took a dark turn after the tenant took her young daughter to the doctor and discovered lead-related health issues. The doctor's office, obliged by law to report such matters, notified the appropriate authorities. Enraged by this turn of events, the landlord embarked on a vicious, retaliatory campaign against the tenant that the trial court chronicled in painstaking detail in its posttrial entry awarding the tenant damages based on the landlord's conduct. In fact, the conduct was so outrageous that the trial court imposed punitive damages. While the landlord now endeavors to challenge these damage awards, she fails to succeed under the manifest weight standard of review.
An ordinary landlord-tenant relationship took a dark turn after the tenant took her young daughter to the doctor and discovered lead-related health issues. The doctor's office, obliged by law to report such matters, notified the appropriate authorities. Enraged by this turn of events, the landlord embarked on a vicious, retaliatory campaign against the tenant that the trial court chronicled in painstaking detail in its posttrial entry awarding the tenant damages based on the landlord's conduct. In fact, the conduct was so outrageous that the trial court imposed punitive damages. While the landlord now endeavors to challenge these damage awards, she fails to succeed under the manifest weight standard of review.
Outcome:
The judgment of the trial court in the plaintiff's favor affirmed.
Remanded for the purpose of determining the attorney fees to be paid to the Plaintiff.
Remanded for the purpose of determining the attorney fees to be paid to the Plaintiff.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Cristina Burcica v. Natalie Ludy?
The outcome was: The judgment of the trial court in the plaintiff's favor affirmed. Remanded for the purpose of determining the attorney fees to be paid to the Plaintiff.
Which court heard Cristina Burcica v. Natalie Ludy?
This case was heard in Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County, Ohio, OH. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in Cristina Burcica v. Natalie Ludy?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Cincinnati Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: John Mulvey.
When was Cristina Burcica v. Natalie Ludy decided?
This case was decided on December 27, 2024.