Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Tracy Halsell v. Cincinnati Police Department, et al.

Date: 02-13-2023

Case Number: 1:23-cv-24

Judge: Susan J. Dlott

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Hamilton County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Pro Se Plaintiff

















Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan



Click Here For The Best Cincinnati Civil Rights Lawyer Directory



If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.





Defendant's Attorney: No appearance

Description:
Cincinnati, Ohio pro se plaintiff sued the Cincinnati Police Department and others on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming $2 million in damages as a direct result of the violation of her rights.



The elements of a § 1983 claim are (1) the action occurred "under color of state law” and (2) the action resulted in the deprivation of a constitutional right or federal statutory right.
Outcome:
02/13/2023 5 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 4 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, Plaintiffs suit is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff is WARNED that filing additional frivolous lawsuits in this District Court may result in sanctions or a determination that Plaintiff is a vexatious litigant. The Court CERTIFIES that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal of this decision could not be taken in good faith.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 2/13/2023. (wam)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) (Entered: 02/13/2023)

02/13/2023 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT affirming doc.#5. (wam)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) (Entered: 02/13/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
Editor's Note: Pro se plaintiffs in civil rights cases stand essentially no chance of prevailing.

About This Case

What was the outcome of Tracy Halsell v. Cincinnati Police Department, et al.?

The outcome was: 02/13/2023 5 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 4 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, Plaintiffs suit is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff is WARNED that filing additional frivolous lawsuits in this District Court may result in sanctions or a determination that Plaintiff is a vexatious litigant. The Court CERTIFIES that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal of this decision could not be taken in good faith.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 2/13/2023. (wam)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) (Entered: 02/13/2023) 02/13/2023 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT affirming doc.#5. (wam)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) (Entered: 02/13/2023)

Which court heard Tracy Halsell v. Cincinnati Police Department, et al.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Hamilton County), OH. The presiding judge was Susan J. Dlott.

Who were the attorneys in Tracy Halsell v. Cincinnati Police Department, et al.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Pro Se Plaintiff Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Cincinnati Civil Rights Lawyer Directory If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.. Defendant's attorney: No appearance.

When was Tracy Halsell v. Cincinnati Police Department, et al. decided?

This case was decided on February 13, 2023.