Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
STATE OF OHIO - vs - DANA L. BOWLES
Date: 06-26-2021
Case Number: CA2020-09-065
Judge: Per Curiam
Court: IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY
Plaintiff's Attorney: David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney
Defendant's Attorney:
Middletown, Ohio Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Middletown, Ohio Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Middletown, Ohio - Criminal defense attorney represented Dana Bowles with iling a notice of appeal.
This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by
appellant, Dana Bowles, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of
proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and
upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. Warren CA2020-09-065
{ΒΆ2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of
the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court
prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;
(2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87
S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine
whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of
appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for
appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both
the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
About This Case
What was the outcome of STATE OF OHIO - vs - DANA L. BOWLES?
The outcome was: Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
Which court heard STATE OF OHIO - vs - DANA L. BOWLES?
This case was heard in IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY, OH. The presiding judge was Per Curiam.
Who were the attorneys in STATE OF OHIO - vs - DANA L. BOWLES?
Plaintiff's attorney: David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney. Defendant's attorney: Middletown, Ohio Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was STATE OF OHIO - vs - DANA L. BOWLES decided?
This case was decided on June 26, 2021.