Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Sylvia C. Cohen v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.

Date: 08-06-2007

Case Number: 06-0409-cv

Judge: REENA RAGGI

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on appeal from the Eastern District of New York, Kings County

Plaintiff's Attorney:

CATHERINE E. ANDERSON, Giskan & Solotaroff, New York, New York, for
Plaintiff-Appellant.

CHRISTINE N. KOHL, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice,
Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae the United States Department of
Housing and Urban Development in support of Plaintiff-Appellant.

Defendant's Attorney:


GARY C. TEPPER, Arent Fox PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Defendants-
Appellees.

Description:


Plaintiff Sylvia C. Cohen sued defendants JP Morgan Chase & Co. and JP Morgan
Chase Bank (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Chase") in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of New York (Charles P. Sifton, Judge), alleging that Chase's
collection of an unearned "post-closing fee" in connection with its refinancing of her home
mortgage violated Section 8(b) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974
("RESPA"), 12 U.S.C. § 2607(b), and New York General Business Law § 349. In a
judgment entered on March 16, 2005, Cohen v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., No. CV-04-
4098(CPS) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2005), the district court dismissed Cohen's complaint on the
ground that it failed to state a claim under RESPA § 8(b) because (1) the fee at issue was
analogous to an "overcharge," which Kruse v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., 383 F.3d
49, 55-57 (2d Cir. 2004), held was not prohibited by § 8(b); and (2) plaintiff had, in any
event, failed to plead that the challenged fee represented part of a charge split between Chase and one or more third parties. The district court similarly concluded that Cohen failed to
state a deceptive practices claim under state law because the pleaded facts demonstrated that
the challenged fee was disclosed.

Outcome:
The judgments of the district court, entered on March 16, 2005, and January 4, 2006,
are VACATED, and the case is hereby REMANDED for reinstatement of the complaint and
further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
None

About This Case

What was the outcome of Sylvia C. Cohen v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.?

The outcome was: The judgments of the district court, entered on March 16, 2005, and January 4, 2006, are VACATED, and the case is hereby REMANDED for reinstatement of the complaint and further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Which court heard Sylvia C. Cohen v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.?

This case was heard in United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on appeal from the Eastern District of New York, Kings County, NY. The presiding judge was REENA RAGGI.

Who were the attorneys in Sylvia C. Cohen v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.?

Plaintiff's attorney: CATHERINE E. ANDERSON, Giskan & Solotaroff, New York, New York, for Plaintiff-Appellant. CHRISTINE N. KOHL, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development in support of Plaintiff-Appellant.. Defendant's attorney: GARY C. TEPPER, Arent Fox PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Defendants- Appellees..

When was Sylvia C. Cohen v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. decided?

This case was decided on August 6, 2007.