Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Renata Supina-Saltus
Date: 04-01-2026
Case Number:
Judge: Maria E. Garcia
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in New York City
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best New York City Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
New York City, New York, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with wire fraud.
Renata Supina-Saltus, an employee of the Republic Croatia ran a long-running fraud scheme in which she fabricated invoices to embezzle approximately $750,000.
“Renata Supina-Saltus held a position of trust as member of the Permanent Mission of the Republic of Croatia to the United Nations,” said HSI Acting Special Agent in Charge Michael Alfonso. “She’s alleged today to have absolutely exploited that trust, enriching herself to the tune of $750,000. Financial crime and corruption undermine institutions and HSI will leverage our international footprint to aggressively pursue those who abuse their positions to benefit themselves.”
According to the allegations contained in the Complaint:[1]
From at least in or about July 2017 through in or about November 2023, SUPINA-SALTUS worked at the PMRC in a financial administrative capacity. By virtue of her position, SUPINA-SALTUS had unique access to the PMRC’s vendor payment systems and was authorized to submit and process invoices on the PMRC’s behalf.
For approximately six years SUPINA-SALTUS used her access and position to carry out a fraudulent invoicing scheme to embezzle funds from the PMRC’s accounts into her own personal bank accounts. SUPINA-SALTUS carried out this scheme by at least two different means. SUPINA-SALTUS sometimes made double payments for certain invoices, which typically involved an authorized payment to the vendor for the PMRC and then a second payment of the same amount to one of SUPINA-SALTUS’s own bank accounts. At other times, SUPINA-SALTUS created fake invoices—sometimes from fictitious vendors—and billed them to the PMRC, but then directed the fraudulent payments to bank accounts under her control.
In total, SUPINA-SALTUS embezzled at least approximately $750,000 over the course of her fraudulent invoicing scheme and used the funds for her personal benefit.
* * *
SUPINA-SALTUS, 59, of West Haven, Connecticut, is charged with one count of wire fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison; and two counts of money laundering, each of which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.
The maximum potential sentences in this case are prescribed by Congress and provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by a judge.
Mr. Clayton thanked the State Attorney's Office of the Republic of Croatia, Office for the Suppression of Corruption and Organised Crime. Mr. Clayton also praised the outstanding investigative work of HSI, its New England Field Office and Attache in Vienna, as well as the New York City Police Department.
Renata Supina-Saltus, an employee of the Republic Croatia ran a long-running fraud scheme in which she fabricated invoices to embezzle approximately $750,000.
“Renata Supina-Saltus held a position of trust as member of the Permanent Mission of the Republic of Croatia to the United Nations,” said HSI Acting Special Agent in Charge Michael Alfonso. “She’s alleged today to have absolutely exploited that trust, enriching herself to the tune of $750,000. Financial crime and corruption undermine institutions and HSI will leverage our international footprint to aggressively pursue those who abuse their positions to benefit themselves.”
According to the allegations contained in the Complaint:[1]
From at least in or about July 2017 through in or about November 2023, SUPINA-SALTUS worked at the PMRC in a financial administrative capacity. By virtue of her position, SUPINA-SALTUS had unique access to the PMRC’s vendor payment systems and was authorized to submit and process invoices on the PMRC’s behalf.
For approximately six years SUPINA-SALTUS used her access and position to carry out a fraudulent invoicing scheme to embezzle funds from the PMRC’s accounts into her own personal bank accounts. SUPINA-SALTUS carried out this scheme by at least two different means. SUPINA-SALTUS sometimes made double payments for certain invoices, which typically involved an authorized payment to the vendor for the PMRC and then a second payment of the same amount to one of SUPINA-SALTUS’s own bank accounts. At other times, SUPINA-SALTUS created fake invoices—sometimes from fictitious vendors—and billed them to the PMRC, but then directed the fraudulent payments to bank accounts under her control.
In total, SUPINA-SALTUS embezzled at least approximately $750,000 over the course of her fraudulent invoicing scheme and used the funds for her personal benefit.
* * *
SUPINA-SALTUS, 59, of West Haven, Connecticut, is charged with one count of wire fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison; and two counts of money laundering, each of which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.
The maximum potential sentences in this case are prescribed by Congress and provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by a judge.
Mr. Clayton thanked the State Attorney's Office of the Republic of Croatia, Office for the Suppression of Corruption and Organised Crime. Mr. Clayton also praised the outstanding investigative work of HSI, its New England Field Office and Attache in Vienna, as well as the New York City Police Department.
Outcome:
An indictment is not proof of guilt.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Renata Supina-Saltus?
The outcome was: An indictment is not proof of guilt.
Which court heard United States of America v. Renata Supina-Saltus?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York County), NY. The presiding judge was Maria E. Garcia.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Renata Supina-Saltus?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in New York City. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best New York City Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Renata Supina-Saltus decided?
This case was decided on April 1, 2026.