Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Erick Blecher, et al. v. The Holy See, a/k/a The Apostolic See
Date: 08-01-2025
Case Number:
Judge: Oetken
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best New York Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best New York Insurance Defense Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on negligence theories.
The question presented in this case is whether the discretionary function exclusion from the tortious activity exception of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ("FSIAâ€) precludes federal courts from exercising jurisdiction over claims against the Holy See concerning child sexual abuse perpetrated by clerics in the United States. Plaintiffs-Appellants are thirty survivors of childhood sexual abuse who seek damages for negligence from Defendant-Appellee the Holy See under a vicarious liability theory. They allege that the Holy See promulgated a mandatory policy of secrecy that governed how its dioceses and bishops handled reports of sexual abuse by clerics. In adhering to this policy, Plaintiffs allege, bishops in New York—the Holy See's employees—failed to warn children and parents of the dangers posed by the accused clerics and failed to report suspected abuse to law enforcement, thus emboldening abusers and exposing children to a foreseeable risk of harm. The District Court (Oetken, J.) granted the Holy See's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the FSIA, concluding that the discretionary function exclusion from the FSIA's tortious activity exception barred Plaintiffs' claims. On de novo review, we agree with the District Court.
The question presented in this case is whether the discretionary function exclusion from the tortious activity exception of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ("FSIAâ€) precludes federal courts from exercising jurisdiction over claims against the Holy See concerning child sexual abuse perpetrated by clerics in the United States. Plaintiffs-Appellants are thirty survivors of childhood sexual abuse who seek damages for negligence from Defendant-Appellee the Holy See under a vicarious liability theory. They allege that the Holy See promulgated a mandatory policy of secrecy that governed how its dioceses and bishops handled reports of sexual abuse by clerics. In adhering to this policy, Plaintiffs allege, bishops in New York—the Holy See's employees—failed to warn children and parents of the dangers posed by the accused clerics and failed to report suspected abuse to law enforcement, thus emboldening abusers and exposing children to a foreseeable risk of harm. The District Court (Oetken, J.) granted the Holy See's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the FSIA, concluding that the discretionary function exclusion from the FSIA's tortious activity exception barred Plaintiffs' claims. On de novo review, we agree with the District Court.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Erick Blecher, et al. v. The Holy See, a/k/a The Apostoli...?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard Erick Blecher, et al. v. The Holy See, a/k/a The Apostoli...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York County), NY. The presiding judge was Oetken.
Who were the attorneys in Erick Blecher, et al. v. The Holy See, a/k/a The Apostoli...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best New York Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best New York Insurance Defense Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was Erick Blecher, et al. v. The Holy See, a/k/a The Apostoli... decided?
This case was decided on August 1, 2025.