Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Richard J. Haughey v. County of Putnam

Date: 11-21-2023

Case Number: 7:18-cv-02861

Judge: Kenneth M. Karas

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Westchester County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:





Click Here For The Best White Plains Civil Rights Lawyer Directory







Defendant's Attorney: Kenneth Ethan Pitcoff, Drew William Sumner, James A. Randazzo

Description:
White Plains, New York personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on civil rights violation theories.
Outcome:
It is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty day period to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are denied. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 11/17/23) (yv) (Entered: 11/17/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Richard J. Haughey v. County of Putnam?

The outcome was: It is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty day period to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are denied. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 11/17/23) (yv) (Entered: 11/17/2023)

Which court heard Richard J. Haughey v. County of Putnam?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Westchester County), NY. The presiding judge was Kenneth M. Karas.

Who were the attorneys in Richard J. Haughey v. County of Putnam?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best White Plains Civil Rights Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Kenneth Ethan Pitcoff, Drew William Sumner, James A. Randazzo.

When was Richard J. Haughey v. County of Putnam decided?

This case was decided on November 21, 2023.