Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Rowshan Jamil v. TSC Food Service, Inc., d/b/a Wendy's

Date: 03-25-2022

Case Number: 1:21-cv-09625-AT

Judge: Analisa Torres

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Stefanie Shmil and Steve Fingerhut

Defendant's Attorney: Daniel M. Bernstein and Robin Koshy

Description:
New York, New York employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights violation job discrimination (age) theory.
Outcome:
03/23/2022 21 ORDER: The Court has been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle. ECF No. 20. The above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. Any application to reopen must be filed within sixty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same sixty-day period to be so ordered by the Court. Per Rule IV(C) of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/23/2022) (kv) (Entered: 03/23/2022)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Rowshan Jamil v. TSC Food Service, Inc., d/b/a Wendy's?

The outcome was: 03/23/2022 21 ORDER: The Court has been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle. ECF No. 20. The above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. Any application to reopen must be filed within sixty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same sixty-day period to be so ordered by the Court. Per Rule IV(C) of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/23/2022) (kv) (Entered: 03/23/2022)

Which court heard Rowshan Jamil v. TSC Food Service, Inc., d/b/a Wendy's?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York County), NY. The presiding judge was Analisa Torres.

Who were the attorneys in Rowshan Jamil v. TSC Food Service, Inc., d/b/a Wendy's?

Plaintiff's attorney: Stefanie Shmil and Steve Fingerhut. Defendant's attorney: Daniel M. Bernstein and Robin Koshy.

When was Rowshan Jamil v. TSC Food Service, Inc., d/b/a Wendy's decided?

This case was decided on March 25, 2022.