Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Nicholas Wellington and Tashlee Powel v. Joshua M. Marcano-Perez and Universal Moving Services

Date: 03-25-2022

Case Number: 1:19-cv-03167-DCF

Judge: Debra C. Freeman

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Chad Russell

Defendant's Attorney: Jason M. Bernheimer and Connor William Fallon

Description:
New York, New York personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of trucking accident caused by Joshua M. Marcano-Perez.



The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.



This case was initially filed in the State Court - Supreme, 22242-2018E, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Outcome:
03/24/2022 21 STIPULATION OF DISCONTINUANCE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the respective parties herein that the above entitled action is discontinued, including any and all direct claims, counter-claims and/or cross-claims, with prejudice and without costs to any party and that this Stipulation may filed with the Clerk of the Court without further notice. Based on this stipulation, and on the representations of Plaintiff's counsel made in a telephone conference held on 3/22/2022 and by letter of the same date (see Dkt. 20) that Plaintiff wishes to voluntarily discontinue its claims, without prejudice, against non-appearing defendant Zip to Zip Moving Co., it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's claims against defendant Universal Moving Services and Joshua M. Marcano-Perez are dismissed with prejudice, and (2) Plaintiff's claims against defendant Zip to Zip Moving Co. are dismissed without prejudice. This resolves all claims, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this action on the Docket of the Court. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 3/24/2022) (ate) (Entered: 03/24/2022)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Nicholas Wellington and Tashlee Powel v. Joshua M. Marcan...?

The outcome was: 03/24/2022 21 STIPULATION OF DISCONTINUANCE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the respective parties herein that the above entitled action is discontinued, including any and all direct claims, counter-claims and/or cross-claims, with prejudice and without costs to any party and that this Stipulation may filed with the Clerk of the Court without further notice. Based on this stipulation, and on the representations of Plaintiff's counsel made in a telephone conference held on 3/22/2022 and by letter of the same date (see Dkt. 20) that Plaintiff wishes to voluntarily discontinue its claims, without prejudice, against non-appearing defendant Zip to Zip Moving Co., it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's claims against defendant Universal Moving Services and Joshua M. Marcano-Perez are dismissed with prejudice, and (2) Plaintiff's claims against defendant Zip to Zip Moving Co. are dismissed without prejudice. This resolves all claims, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this action on the Docket of the Court. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 3/24/2022) (ate) (Entered: 03/24/2022)

Which court heard Nicholas Wellington and Tashlee Powel v. Joshua M. Marcan...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York County), NY. The presiding judge was Debra C. Freeman.

Who were the attorneys in Nicholas Wellington and Tashlee Powel v. Joshua M. Marcan...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Chad Russell. Defendant's attorney: Jason M. Bernheimer and Connor William Fallon.

When was Nicholas Wellington and Tashlee Powel v. Joshua M. Marcan... decided?

This case was decided on March 25, 2022.