Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Eric Van Vleet

Date: 12-19-2025

Case Number: 23-cr-01017

Judge: Madeline Cox Arleo

Court: United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Essex County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Newark

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Newark Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory


Description:
Newark, New Jersey, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiring to bill Medicare for medically unnecessary prescriptions.

From February 2018 to September 2019, Eric Van Vleet, 30, of Delray Beach, Florida, operated Hype Med LLC, which generated medically unnecessary prescriptions through a telemarketing and telemedicine scheme. As part of the health care fraud and kickback conspiracy, Van Vleet and Hype Med identified Medicare beneficiaries to target for expensive drugs. Call center employees contacted beneficiaries to pressure them to agree to try expensive medications, such as pain creams, scar creams, eczema creams, migraine medication, and a combination of prescription medications to be used as a “foot soak.” Van Vleet and Hype Med then sent recordings of calls with the beneficiaries, along with pre-marked prescription pads for particular drugs that would yield exorbitant reimbursements, to telemedicine companies. Hype Med paid the telemedicine companies kickbacks for every beneficiary referred for a prescription, and the telemedicine companies paid doctors to approve the prescriptions.

Van Vleet then directed the prescriptions to pharmacies, including Apogee Bio-Pharm LLC, located in Edison, New Jersey, with which Hype Med had a kickback arrangement. The pharmacies filled the prescriptions and sought reimbursement from federal health care benefit programs, including Medicare. The pharmacies, including Apogee, then paid a portion of each reimbursement to Hype Med as a kickback. Van Vleet and Hype Med received at least approximately $343,683.69 in kickback payments from the owners of Apogee. The principals of Apogee—William Welwart, Ethan Welwart, and Gary Kaczka—are charged with health care fraud and related offenses in a separate indictment. Elan Yaish, former President of Apogee, previously pleaded guilty to an information charging conspiracy to violate the federal anti-kickback statute. As a result of medically unnecessary prescriptions generated by Hype Med, Medicare paid at least $1,399,812.52 based on false and fraudulent claims.

Senior Counsel Lamparello credited special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Stefanie Roddy in Newark, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Naomi Gruchacz, and U.S. Department of Defense, Office of Inspector General, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Northeast Field Office, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Christopher M. Silvestro, with the investigation.

The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Katherine M. Romano, Chief of the General Crimes Unit in Newark.
Outcome:
The Defendant elected to plead guilty.

The health care fraud conspiracy charge carries a maximum potential penalty of 10 years in prison, and the charge of conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute carries a maximum potential penalty of 5 years in prison. Each count is also punishable by a fine of $250,000, or twice the gain or loss from the offense, whichever is greatest.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Eric Van Vleet?

The outcome was: The Defendant elected to plead guilty. The health care fraud conspiracy charge carries a maximum potential penalty of 10 years in prison, and the charge of conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute carries a maximum potential penalty of 5 years in prison. Each count is also punishable by a fine of $250,000, or twice the gain or loss from the offense, whichever is greatest.

Which court heard United States of America v. Eric Van Vleet?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Essex County), NJ. The presiding judge was Madeline Cox Arleo.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Eric Van Vleet?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Newark. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Newark Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Eric Van Vleet decided?

This case was decided on December 19, 2025.