Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
William Klimkofsky v. Borough of Bellmawr, et al.
Date: 06-23-2025
Case Number: 21-CV-10616
Judge: Joseph H. Rodriguez
Court: United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Camden County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Saul Steinberg
Defendant's Attorney: Brooks Didonato
Description:
Camden, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights violation theory.
Gym owner who defied COVID orders sues N.J. town, seekomg $80M in damages. Plaintiff, a South Jersey gym owner who made national headlines for defying COVID-19 lockdown orders has filed a federal lawsuit against Bellmawr officials, accusing them of malicious prosecution, retaliation and conspiring to destroy his business.
Gym owner who defied COVID orders sues N.J. town, seekomg $80M in damages. Plaintiff, a South Jersey gym owner who made national headlines for defying COVID-19 lockdown orders has filed a federal lawsuit against Bellmawr officials, accusing them of malicious prosecution, retaliation and conspiring to destroy his business.
Outcome:
Unknown
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of William Klimkofsky v. Borough of Bellmawr, et al.?
The outcome was: Unknown
Which court heard William Klimkofsky v. Borough of Bellmawr, et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Camden County), NJ. The presiding judge was Joseph H. Rodriguez.
Who were the attorneys in William Klimkofsky v. Borough of Bellmawr, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Saul Steinberg. Defendant's attorney: Brooks Didonato.
When was William Klimkofsky v. Borough of Bellmawr, et al. decided?
This case was decided on June 23, 2025.