Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Onur Aksoy, aka Ron Aksoy, aka Dave Durden

Date: 07-08-2022

Case Number:

Judge: Not assigned.

Court: United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Essex County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:









Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan



Click Here For The Best * Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory





Description:
Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with fraud.



Onur Aksoy, aka Ron Aksoy, aka Dave Durden, 38, of Miami, allegedly ran at least 19 companies formed in New Jersey and Florida as well as at least 15 Amazon storefronts, at least 10 eBay storefronts, and multiple other entities (collectively, the "Pro Network Entities”) that imported tens of thousands of fraudulent and counterfeit Cisco networking devices from China and Hong Kong and resold them to customers in the United States and overseas, falsely representing the products as new and genuine. The operation allegedly generated over $100 million in revenue, and Aksoy received millions of dollars for his personal gain.



According to the indictment, the devices the Pro Network Entities imported from China and Hong Kong were typically older, lower-model products, some of which had been sold or discarded, which Chinese counterfeiters then modified to appear to be genuine versions of new, enhanced, and more expensive Cisco devices. As alleged, the Chinese counterfeiters often added pirated Cisco software and unauthorized, low-quality, or unreliable components – including components to circumvent technological measures added by Cisco to the software to check for software license compliance and to authenticate the hardware. Finally, to make the devices appear new, genuine, high-quality, and factory-sealed by Cisco, the Chinese counterfeiters allegedly added counterfeited Cisco labels, stickers, boxes, documentation, packaging, and other materials.



The fraudulent and counterfeit products sold by the Pro Network Entities suffered from numerous performance, functionality, and safety problems. Often, they would simply fail or otherwise malfunction, causing significant damage to their users' networks and operations – in some cases, costing users tens of thousands of dollars. Customers of Aksoy's fraudulent and counterfeit devices included hospitals, schools, government agencies, and the military.



As set forth in the indictment, between 2014 and 2022, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) seized approximately 180 shipments of counterfeit Cisco devices being shipped to the Pro Network Entities from China and Hong Kong. In response to some of these seizures, Aksoy allegedly falsely submitted official paperwork to CBP under the alias "Dave Durden,” an identity that he used to communicate with Chinese co-conspirators. To try to avoid CBP scrutiny, Chinese co-conspirators allegedly broke the shipments up into smaller parcels and shipped them on different days, and Aksoy used at least two fake delivery addresses in Ohio. After CBP seized a shipment of counterfeit Cisco products to Aksoy and the Pro Network Entities and sent a seizure notice, Aksoy allegedly often continued to order counterfeit Cisco products from the same supplier.



According to the indictment, between 2014 and 2019, Cisco sent seven letters to Aksoy asking him to cease and desist his trafficking of counterfeit goods. Aksoy allegedly responded to at least two of these letters by causing his attorney to provide Cisco with forged documents. In July 2021, agents executed a search warrant at Aksoy's warehouse and seized 1,156 counterfeit Cisco devices with a retail value of over $7 million.



Aksoy is charged with one count of conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods and to commit mail and wire fraud; three counts of mail fraud; four counts of wire fraud; and three counts of trafficking in counterfeit goods. Aksoy was charged by a criminal complaint filed in New Jersey on June 29 and was arrested in Miami the same day.



Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite, Jr. of the Justice Department's Criminal Division; Attorney for the United States Vikas Khanna of the District of New Jersey; Acting Special Agent in Charge Eddy Wang of the Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Los Angeles Field Office; Special Agent in Charge Bryan Denny of the U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) Western Field Office; Special Agent in Charge Floyd Martinez of the General Services Administration Office of Inspector General (GSA-OIG), Southeast and Caribbean Division; Special Agent in Charge Peter Tolentino of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), Economic Crimes Field Office; Special Agent in Charge Anthony Salisbury of the HSI Miami Field Office; and Special Agent in Charge Jason Molina of the HSI Newark Field Office made the announcement today.



The CBP Electronics Center of Excellence; the CBP Los Angeles National Targeting and Analysis Center; and the CBP Office of Trade, Regulatory Audit and Agency Advisory Services, Miami Field Office provided valuable assistance.



If you believe you are a victim of Aksoy or the Pro Network Entities, please visit www.justice.gov/largecases or https://edit.justice.gov/usao-nj/united-states-v-onur-aksoy-pro-network for more information.



The Pro Network Entities include at least the following:



Pro Network Companies





Approximate Month and Year of Formation





State of Formation



Pro Network LLC





August 2013





New Jersey



Netech Solutions LLC





November 2016





Florida



Target Network Solutions LLC





January 2017





Florida



Easy Network LLC





April 2017





New Jersey



ACE NETUS LLC (aka Ace Network)





April 2017





New Jersey



My Network Dealer LLC





April 2017





New Jersey



1701 Doral LLC





May 2017





New Jersey



Maytech Trading LLC





August 2017





Florida



NFD Trading LLC





September 2017





Florida



Kenet Solutions LLC





September 2017





Florida



Team Tech Global LLC





January 2018





New Jersey



Tenek Trading LLC





January 2018





Florida



The Network Gears LLC





February 2018





Florida



All Networking Solutions LLC (aka All Network)





April 2018





Florida



San Network LLC





October 2018





Florida



Pro Network US Inc.





January 2019





Florida



Jms Tek LLC





August 2019





Florida



Renewed Equipment LLC





August 2021





Florida



Pro Ship US LLC





August 2021





Florida







Pro Network Amazon Storefronts





Approximate Date of Earliest



Known Activity



Albus Trade Hub





January 2014



EasyNetworkUS





March 2014



Get Better Trade





July 2015



Mercadeal





February 2017



Netech Solutions





February 2018



Netkco LLC





September 2014



NFD Trading LLC





January 2018



Palm Network Solutions





June 2017



Renewed Equip





August 2017



Servtaur





August 2019



Smart Network





July 2017



SOS Tech Trade





August 2017



Target-Solutions





September 2020



TeamTech Global





March 2016



TradeOrigin US





August 2015







Pro Network eBay Storefronts





Approximate Date of Earliest



Known Activity



connectwus





March 2014



futuretechneeds





July 2017



getbettertrade





July 2017



getontrade





April 2016



maytechtradingllc





October 2017



netechsolutions





April 2017



netkco





September 2014



nfdtrading





February 2018



smartnetworkusa





January 2014



tenektradingllc





May 2018



HSI, DCIS, GSA-OIG, NCIS, and CBP are investigating the case.



Senior Counsel Matthew A. Lamberti of the Criminal Division's Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew M. Trombly and Senior Trial Counsel Barbara Ward of the District of New Jersey are prosecuting the case.
Outcome:
An indictment is merely an allegation, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Onur Aksoy, aka Ron Aksoy, ak...?

The outcome was: An indictment is merely an allegation, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Which court heard United States of America v. Onur Aksoy, aka Ron Aksoy, ak...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Essex County), NJ. The presiding judge was Not assigned..

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Onur Aksoy, aka Ron Aksoy, ak...?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States Attorney’s Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best * Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Onur Aksoy, aka Ron Aksoy, ak... decided?

This case was decided on July 8, 2022.