Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Jervon Duhart and Areana Duhart v. Target Corporation, et al.

Date: 03-12-2022

Case Number: 1:18-cv-16185-CDJ-MJS

Judge: C. Darnell Jones, II

Court: United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Camden County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Devesh Taskar

Defendant's Attorney: Devech Taskar, Robert Segal, Robb Graham

Description:

Camden, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores.

This case was initially filed in the Superior Court of Camden County NJ, CAM L 3359 18, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Outcome:

03/11/2022 49 Order Administratively Terminating Action - 60 Day, Pending Consummation of Settlement. Administrative Termination deadline set for 5/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill on 3/10/2022. (dmr) (Entered: 03/11/2022)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Jervon Duhart and Areana Duhart v. Target Corporation, et...?

The outcome was: 03/11/2022 49 Order Administratively Terminating Action - 60 Day, Pending Consummation of Settlement. Administrative Termination deadline set for 5/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill on 3/10/2022. (dmr) (Entered: 03/11/2022)

Which court heard Jervon Duhart and Areana Duhart v. Target Corporation, et...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Camden County), NJ. The presiding judge was C. Darnell Jones, II.

Who were the attorneys in Jervon Duhart and Areana Duhart v. Target Corporation, et...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Devesh Taskar. Defendant's attorney: Devech Taskar, Robert Segal, Robb Graham.

When was Jervon Duhart and Areana Duhart v. Target Corporation, et... decided?

This case was decided on March 12, 2022.