Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Stephen Lanzo, III, et aux v. Johnson & Johnson and Imergys
Date: 04-08-2018
Case Number:
Judge: Not available
Court: New Jersey
Plaintiff's Attorney: Not Available
Defendant's Attorney:
Description:
Newark, NJ - Stephen Lanzo, III, and wife sued Johnson & Johnson and Imergys on product liability theories claiming that M. Lanzo developed mesothelioma as a direct result of exposure to asbestos in Johnson & Johnson talcum powder supplied to it by Imerys.
Lanzo claied that he used talcum power for decades and that it contained asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson denied that its baby powder contained talcum power despite company documents to the contrary.
Lanzo claied that he used talcum power for decades and that it contained asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson denied that its baby powder contained talcum power despite company documents to the contrary.
Outcome:
Plaintiff's verdict for $37 million.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Stephen Lanzo, III, et aux v. Johnson & Johnson and Imergys?
The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $37 million.
Which court heard Stephen Lanzo, III, et aux v. Johnson & Johnson and Imergys?
This case was heard in New Jersey, NJ. The presiding judge was Not available.
Who were the attorneys in Stephen Lanzo, III, et aux v. Johnson & Johnson and Imergys?
Plaintiff's attorney: Not Available.
When was Stephen Lanzo, III, et aux v. Johnson & Johnson and Imergys decided?
This case was decided on April 8, 2018.