Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

The State of New Hamphire v. Matthew Clark

Date: 11-13-2024

Case Number: 2023-0451

Judge: Howard

Court: Superior Court, Hillsborough County, New Hampshire

Plaintiff's Attorney: Hillsborough County, New Hampshire County Attorney's Office

Defendant's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Manchester Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory





Description:
Manchester, New Hampshire criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with criminal threatening with a deadly weapon.



Matthew Clark, challenges an order of the Superior Court (Howard, J.) denying his motion to suppress an audio recording made by the complainant without the defendant's consent.



Outcome:
suppression of a communication under RSA 570-A:6 is required only when the interception of the communication is a felony violation of the Wiretapping and Eavesdropping Law.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of The State of New Hamphire v. Matthew Clark?

The outcome was: suppression of a communication under RSA 570-A:6 is required only when the interception of the communication is a felony violation of the Wiretapping and Eavesdropping Law.

Which court heard The State of New Hamphire v. Matthew Clark?

This case was heard in Superior Court, Hillsborough County, New Hampshire, NH. The presiding judge was Howard.

Who were the attorneys in The State of New Hamphire v. Matthew Clark?

Plaintiff's attorney: Hillsborough County, New Hampshire County Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Manchester Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was The State of New Hamphire v. Matthew Clark decided?

This case was decided on November 13, 2024.