Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Nebraska v. Richard L. Roebuck
Date: 06-06-2022
Case Number: 31 Neb. App. 67
Judge:
Michael W. Pirtle
Kevin R. McManaman
Court:
Nebraska Court of Appeals
On appeal from The District Court for Lancaster County
Plaintiff's Attorney: Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Siobhan E.
Duffy
Defendant's Attorney:
Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World.
Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement
Counselor:
MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public.
MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge
Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800
court affirming Roebuck’s conviction and sentence for assault
and battery in violation of Lincoln Mun. Code § 9.12.010.
Additionally, we conclude the appellate record is insufficient
to determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to
call as witnesses the mother and sister of F.P. and for failing
to properly advise Roebuck on his right to testify. With regard
to the remaining claims of ineffective assistance, we conclude
the record affirmatively establishes either that trial counsel was
not ineffective or that Roebuck cannot show prejudice.
AffirmeD
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Nebraska v. Richard L. Roebuck?
The outcome was: For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the order of the district court affirming Roebuck’s conviction and sentence for assault and battery in violation of Lincoln Mun. Code § 9.12.010. Additionally, we conclude the appellate record is insufficient to determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call as witnesses the mother and sister of F.P. and for failing to properly advise Roebuck on his right to testify. With regard to the remaining claims of ineffective assistance, we conclude the record affirmatively establishes either that trial counsel was not ineffective or that Roebuck cannot show prejudice. AffirmeD
Which court heard State of Nebraska v. Richard L. Roebuck?
This case was heard in <center><h4><b> Nebraska Court of Appeals </b> <br> <br> <font color="green"><i>On appeal from The District Court for Lancaster County </i></font></center></h4>, NE. The presiding judge was <center><h1> Michael W. Pirtle </h1></center></center> <BR> <center><h4>Kevin R. McManaman </h4> </center>.
Who were the attorneys in State of Nebraska v. Richard L. Roebuck?
Plaintiff's attorney: Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Siobhan E. Duffy. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Lincoln, NE Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World. Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement Counselor: MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public. MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800.
When was State of Nebraska v. Richard L. Roebuck decided?
This case was decided on June 6, 2022.