Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Ashley Marie Askew Quamme v. Chad Q. Quamme
Date: 06-08-2022
Case Number: 2022 ND 124
Judge:
Jon J. Jensen
Steven L. Marquart
Court:
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
On appeal from The District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District
Plaintiff's Attorney: Mark J. Pilch
Defendant's Attorney:
Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World.
Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement
Counselor:
MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public.
MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge
Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800
maintain jurisdiction until we issue our mandate. The amended order and
judgment were entered prior to our mandate, before the time for filing a
petition for rehearing had expired, and while the district court lacked
jurisdiction. We therefore hold the amended order and judgment are void, and
we vacate them. We are not determining whether the district court’s vacated
amended order and judgment comply with our mandate, and we express no
opinion as to the merits of this appeal. Under N.D.R.App.P. 41, we order the
Clerk of the Supreme Court to immediately issue our mandate from this
appeal. When the district court regains jurisdiction, it shall act according to
our opinion and mandate in Quamme I, which remain in effect.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Ashley Marie Askew Quamme v. Chad Q. Quamme?
The outcome was: This case does not involve an exception to the general rule that we maintain jurisdiction until we issue our mandate. The amended order and judgment were entered prior to our mandate, before the time for filing a petition for rehearing had expired, and while the district court lacked jurisdiction. We therefore hold the amended order and judgment are void, and we vacate them. We are not determining whether the district court’s vacated amended order and judgment comply with our mandate, and we express no opinion as to the merits of this appeal. Under N.D.R.App.P. 41, we order the Clerk of the Supreme Court to immediately issue our mandate from this appeal. When the district court regains jurisdiction, it shall act according to our opinion and mandate in Quamme I, which remain in effect.
Which court heard Ashley Marie Askew Quamme v. Chad Q. Quamme?
This case was heard in <center><h4><b> IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA </b> <br> <br> <font color="green"><i>On appeal from The District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District </i></font></center></h4>, ND. The presiding judge was <center><h1>Jon J. Jensen </h1></center></center> <BR> <center><h4> Steven L. Marquart </h4> </center>.
Who were the attorneys in Ashley Marie Askew Quamme v. Chad Q. Quamme?
Plaintiff's attorney: Mark J. Pilch. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Bismarck, ND Divorce Lawyer Directory Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World. Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement Counselor: MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public. MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800.
When was Ashley Marie Askew Quamme v. Chad Q. Quamme decided?
This case was decided on June 8, 2022.