Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Joe Ramon Saucedo v. State of North Dakota

Date: 01-24-2018

Case Number: 2018 ND 2

Judge: Per Curiam

Court: IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Plaintiff's Attorney: Jodi A. Bass, Carmell F. Mattison, Assistant State's Attorneys, and Jenna Bergman

Defendant's Attorney: Kiara Costa Kraus-Parr

Description:

Joe Saucedo appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Saucedo argues the district court erred in denying his application for post-conviction relief because his counsel was ineffective.

Outcome:

We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not clearly err in denying Saucedo's application.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Joe Ramon Saucedo v. State of North Dakota?

The outcome was: We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not clearly err in denying Saucedo's application.

Which court heard Joe Ramon Saucedo v. State of North Dakota?

This case was heard in IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, ND. The presiding judge was Per Curiam.

Who were the attorneys in Joe Ramon Saucedo v. State of North Dakota?

Plaintiff's attorney: Jodi A. Bass, Carmell F. Mattison, Assistant State's Attorneys, and Jenna Bergman. Defendant's attorney: Kiara Costa Kraus-Parr.

When was Joe Ramon Saucedo v. State of North Dakota decided?

This case was decided on January 24, 2018.