Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Asheboro Drug Company, Inc., et al.

Date: 07-13-2022

Case Number: 1:22-cv-00522-CCE-JLW

Judge: Catherine C. Eagles

Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina (Wake County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:





Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan



Click Here For The Best Raleigh Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory



If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free.





Description:
Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented defendants charged with with health care fraud.



Asheboro, North Carolina based Asheboro Drug Company, Isaac F. Brady, III and Isaac F. Brady, IV were accused of dispensing controlled substances, including opioids, without taking specific steps to help ensure the drugs will not be abused or diverted.



The parties entered into a consent decree that resolved the complaint filed by the United States on July 7, alleging that Asheboro Drug Company, and its pharmacists Isaac F. Brady III and Isaac F. Brady IV, a father and son, filled prescriptions in violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The complaint alleges that the defendants dispensed prescription opioids while disregarding numerous "red flags” – that is, obvious indications of drug abuse, drug diversion and drug-seeking behavior. For example, according to the complaint, the defendants filled prescriptions for dangerous combinations of drugs known to be sought by drug abusers and which significantly increase the risk of overdose; filled high-dose opioid prescriptions on a long-term basis; and filled prescriptions for patients who appeared to have "shopped” for doctors willing to prescribe controlled substances. The complaint alleged that the defendants also dispensed, at times, the same or similar prescriptions for multiple members of the same family, refilled prescriptions early without justification, and turned a blind eye to prescriptions from doctors who repeatedly wrote suspect prescriptions.



"The Department of Justice will not hesitate to act when a pharmacy disregards its responsibilities and puts patients at risk,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department's Civil Division. "Pharmacists have a duty to ensure that opioids and other controlled substances are distributed lawfully.”



"Opioid addiction and abuse continue to devastate North Carolina communities,” said U.S. Attorney Sandra J. Hairston for the Middle District of North Carolina. "Pharmacists play a key role in preventing diversion of controlled substances, and they have a legal responsibility to ensure that the prescriptions they fill are legitimate. Our office will continue to pursue dispensers and prescribers who fail to live up to their obligations under the Controlled Substances Act.”



"The law requires pharmacists to ensure that the prescriptions they dispense are for a legitimate medical purposes and are issued by prescribers acting in the usual course of their professional practice,” said Special Agent in Charge Robert J. Murphy of the DEA Atlanta Field Division. "Pharmacists are not simply pill-counters. The penalty and injunction in this case serves notice that DEA will not turn a blind eye when pharmacists shirk their duty by ignoring red flags of abuse and diversion.”



Asheboro Drug and its pharmacists cooperated with the government's investigation and agreed to pay the $300,000 civil monetary penalty and be bound by the consent decree of injunction. The injunction entered by U.S. District Judge Catherine C. Eagles of the Middle District of North Carolina prohibits the defendants from filling certain "red flag” prescriptions and requires the defendants to fill other orders only after receiving documentation justifying the prescriptions.



The government was represented by Senior Litigation Counsel Donald R. Lorenzen of the Civil Division's Consumer Protection Branch and Assistant U.S. Attorney Cassie Crawford for the Middle District of North Carolina, with substantial assistance from Diversion Investigator Heidi Crater of the DEA Greensboro Resident Office's Diversion Group.



Outcome:
07/11/2022 Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Carter, Alexus) (Entered: 07/11/2022)

07/11/2022 5 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Carter, Alexus) (Entered: 07/11/2022)

07/12/2022 Motions Submitted: 3 Consent MOTION for Entry of Consent Decree to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES- (Winchester, Robin) (Entered: 07/12/2022)

07/12/2022 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney JAMES A. WILSON on behalf of Defendants ASHEBORO DRUG COMPANY, INC., ISAAC F. BRADY, III, ISAAC F. BRADY, IV (WILSON, JAMES) (Entered: 07/12/2022)

07/12/2022 7 CONSENT DECREE OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 7/12/2022 as set out herein. (Sheets, Jamie) (Entered: 07/12/2022)

Defendants agreed to pay $300,000 to settle the claims made against them.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Asheboro Drug Company, Inc., ...?

The outcome was: 07/11/2022 Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Carter, Alexus) (Entered: 07/11/2022) 07/11/2022 5 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Carter, Alexus) (Entered: 07/11/2022) 07/12/2022 Motions Submitted: 3 Consent MOTION for Entry of Consent Decree to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES- (Winchester, Robin) (Entered: 07/12/2022) 07/12/2022 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney JAMES A. WILSON on behalf of Defendants ASHEBORO DRUG COMPANY, INC., ISAAC F. BRADY, III, ISAAC F. BRADY, IV (WILSON, JAMES) (Entered: 07/12/2022) 07/12/2022 7 CONSENT DECREE OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 7/12/2022 as set out herein. (Sheets, Jamie) (Entered: 07/12/2022) Defendants agreed to pay $300,000 to settle the claims made against them.

Which court heard United States of America v. Asheboro Drug Company, Inc., ...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina (Wake County), NC. The presiding judge was Catherine C. Eagles.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Asheboro Drug Company, Inc., ...?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States Attorney’s Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Raleigh Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free..

When was United States of America v. Asheboro Drug Company, Inc., ... decided?

This case was decided on July 13, 2022.