Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Chantel Lee King
Date: 06-13-2025
Case Number:
Judge: John Johnston
Court: The United States District Court for the District of Montana
Plaintiff's Attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for Great Falls, Montana
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Great Falls, Montana Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Click Here For The Best Great Falls, Montana Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Hays woman appears on witness tampering and failure to report child abuse charges
A Hays woman accused of witness tampering and failing to report child abuse appeared this week for arraignment, U.S. Attorney Kurt Alme said.
The defendant, Chantel Lee King, 56, pleaded not guilty to a superseding indictment charging her with two counts of attempted obstructing justice by witness tampering and two counts of failure to report child abuse. If convicted of the most serious charge contained in the superseding indictment, King faces 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine, and 3 years of supervised release.
U.S. Magistrate Judge John Johnston presided. King was released on conditions pending further proceedings.
Count 1 of the superseding indictment alleges that in September 2020, King knowingly attempted to intimidate and corruptly persuade another person, with intent to hinder, delay, and prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a federal offense, namely aggravated sexual abuse in Indian Country, sexual abuse in Indian Country, and abusive sexual contact in Indian Country, and took a substantial step towards the commission of the offense.
Count 2 of the superseding indictment alleges that in September 2020, King, a teacher, school counselor, instructional aide, teacher's aide, and teacher's assistant, employed by a tribal, Federal, public, and private school, knowing or having reasonable suspicion that Jane Doe 1 was abused in Indian Country, did fail to immediately report such abuse to the local child protective services agency or local law enforcement agency.
Count 3 of the superseding indictment alleges that in October 2020, King, a teacher, school counselor, instructional aide, teacher's aide, and teacher's assistant, employed by a tribal, Federal, public, and private school, knowing or having reasonable suspicion that Jane Doe 2 was abused in Indian Country, did fail to immediately report such abuse to the local child protective services agency or local law enforcement agency.
Count 4 of the superseding indictment alleges that in October 2020, King knowingly attempted to intimidate and corruptly persuade another person, with intent to hinder, delay, and prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a federal offense, namely aggravated sexual abuse in Indian Country, sexual abuse in Indian Country, and abusive sexual contact in Indian Country, and took a substantial step towards the commission of the offense.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Kalah Paisley is prosecuting the case. The FBI conducted the investigation.
The charging documents are merely accusations and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with witness tampering and failure to report child abuse charges
Hays woman appears on witness tampering and failure to report child abuse charges
A Hays woman accused of witness tampering and failing to report child abuse appeared this week for arraignment, U.S. Attorney Kurt Alme said.
The defendant, Chantel Lee King, 56, pleaded not guilty to a superseding indictment charging her with two counts of attempted obstructing justice by witness tampering and two counts of failure to report child abuse. If convicted of the most serious charge contained in the superseding indictment, King faces 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine, and 3 years of supervised release.
U.S. Magistrate Judge John Johnston presided. King was released on conditions pending further proceedings.
Count 1 of the superseding indictment alleges that in September 2020, King knowingly attempted to intimidate and corruptly persuade another person, with intent to hinder, delay, and prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a federal offense, namely aggravated sexual abuse in Indian Country, sexual abuse in Indian Country, and abusive sexual contact in Indian Country, and took a substantial step towards the commission of the offense.
Count 2 of the superseding indictment alleges that in September 2020, King, a teacher, school counselor, instructional aide, teacher's aide, and teacher's assistant, employed by a tribal, Federal, public, and private school, knowing or having reasonable suspicion that Jane Doe 1 was abused in Indian Country, did fail to immediately report such abuse to the local child protective services agency or local law enforcement agency.
Count 3 of the superseding indictment alleges that in October 2020, King, a teacher, school counselor, instructional aide, teacher's aide, and teacher's assistant, employed by a tribal, Federal, public, and private school, knowing or having reasonable suspicion that Jane Doe 2 was abused in Indian Country, did fail to immediately report such abuse to the local child protective services agency or local law enforcement agency.
Count 4 of the superseding indictment alleges that in October 2020, King knowingly attempted to intimidate and corruptly persuade another person, with intent to hinder, delay, and prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a federal offense, namely aggravated sexual abuse in Indian Country, sexual abuse in Indian Country, and abusive sexual contact in Indian Country, and took a substantial step towards the commission of the offense.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Kalah Paisley is prosecuting the case. The FBI conducted the investigation.
The charging documents are merely accusations and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Outcome:
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Chantel Lee King?
The outcome was:
Which court heard United States of America v. Chantel Lee King?
This case was heard in The United States District Court for the District of Montana, MT. The presiding judge was John Johnston.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Chantel Lee King?
Plaintiff's attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for Great Falls, Montana. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Great Falls, Montana Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Chantel Lee King decided?
This case was decided on June 13, 2025.