Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Brett Mauri

Date: 01-30-2025

Case Number:

Judge: Dana L. Christensen

Court: The United States District Court for the District of Montana

Plaintiff's Attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for Missoula, Montana

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Missoula, Montana Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory





Description:

Missoula, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with defrauding customers


Stevensville timber frame home builder convicted of defrauding customers sentenced to more than five years in prison, ordered to pay $1.8 million restitution





A Stevensville timber frame home builder who was convicted at trial of defrauding customers by using their payments for his own personal expenses instead of building them homes was sentenced today to five years and three months in prison and ordered to pay $1,855,025.25 restitution, U.S. Attorney Jesse Laslovich said.



A federal jury in September 2024 convicted the defendant, Brett Mauri, 61, of four counts of wire fraud and two counts of money laundering.



U.S. District Judge Dana L. Christensen presided. The court also ordered the prison term to be followed by three years of supervised release. The court remanded Mauri to the custody of U.S. Marshals Service.



In court documents and at trial, the government alleged that Mauri owned and operated Bitterroot Timber Frames (BTF) and Three Mile Creek Post & Beam, LLC. According to Mauri and the company's website, BTF built custom timber frame homes across the United States. The government alleged that between 2018 and 2022, Mauri defrauded nine individuals who hired him to build their timber frame homes. Mauri obtained payments from these customers and lied to them about his operations and what he was doing with their money. Mauri ultimately provided little to nothing in return. Mauri's actions affected nine families and hourly employees he failed to pay.



The scheme involved Mauri inducing customers to send him funds, which were ultimately deposited into his or his wife's bank accounts. Mauri and his wife primarily used the money for personal expenses, shopping sprees and travel instead of building the homes as he promised. What work Mauri did perform on victims' projects gave his operation the hallmarks of a Ponzi scheme. He frequently solicited new money from a victim and used the funds, in part, to cover past expenses that were often incurred on earlier projects. In exchange, Mauri provided very little materials or services, and some victims received nothing at all. Those who received some construction work were forced to incur significant expenses to correct Mauri's substandard product and finish their builds or to sell their land when they realized Mauri's promises would never come to fruition. Victims had hired Mauri to build homes in the Montana communities of Whitehall, Victor, Corvallis and Missoula, and in New York, Utah, and Louisiana.



The U.S. Attorney's Office prosecuted the case. The FBI conducted the investigation
Outcome:

Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Brett Mauri?

The outcome was:

Which court heard United States of America v. Brett Mauri?

This case was heard in The United States District Court for the District of Montana, MT. The presiding judge was Dana L. Christensen.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Brett Mauri?

Plaintiff's attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for Missoula, Montana. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Missoula, Montana Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Brett Mauri decided?

This case was decided on January 30, 2025.