Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Missouri vs. Bennie Alford
Date: 02-15-2017
Case Number: ED104176
Judge: James M. Dowd
Court: In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Christine Lesicko
Defendant's Attorney:
Randall Brachman
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Missouri vs. Bennie Alford?
The outcome was: The trial court did not clearly err in overruling Alford’s Batson challenge because Alford failed to carry his burden under the third step of Missouri’s threestep Batson procedure to demonstrate that the State’s avowed reason for striking Venireperson 13 was a pretext for racial discrimination. Thus, Alford’s failure in the third step of his Batson challenge to put anything into the record or make any argument regarding pretext doomed his challenge.
Which court heard State of Missouri vs. Bennie Alford?
This case was heard in In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District, MO. The presiding judge was James M. Dowd.
Who were the attorneys in State of Missouri vs. Bennie Alford?
Plaintiff's attorney: Christine Lesicko. Defendant's attorney: Randall Brachman.
When was State of Missouri vs. Bennie Alford decided?
This case was decided on February 15, 2017.