Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Gary Brown vs. Arnold Day, Defendant Ad Litem for Leary Skinner
Date: 08-07-2007
Case Number: 07-CV105002805
Judge: James Welsh
Court: Circuit Court, Clay County, Missouri
Plaintiff's Attorney:
James C. Wirken of The Wirken Law Group, P.C.
Defendant's Attorney:
Michael P. Joyce and Kevin E. Glynn of Van Osdol, Magruder, Erickson
Plaintiff brought suit against the estate of his attorney for legal malpractice. Plaintiff claimed his attorney had mishandled his dissolution of marriage causing loss of property and additional legal fees. Plaintiff claimed his attorney failed to respond to discovery and mishandled marital and non-marital property and their values. Additionally Plaintiff claimed that Defendant failed to list property in the dissolution an did not timely handle exchanging deeds and retirement plan (Q.D.R.O. - qualified domestic relations order). Defendant, before his death, stated that the dissolution had not been properly handled.
Plaintiff partially caused his own damages, comparative fault withdrawn
Last Demand: Remaining Policy Limits of $140,000
Last Offer: $35,000
About This Case
What was the outcome of Gary Brown vs. Arnold Day, Defendant Ad Litem for Leary S...?
The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $99,114.00.
Which court heard Gary Brown vs. Arnold Day, Defendant Ad Litem for Leary S...?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Clay County, Missouri, MO. The presiding judge was James Welsh.
Who were the attorneys in Gary Brown vs. Arnold Day, Defendant Ad Litem for Leary S...?
Plaintiff's attorney: James C. Wirken of The Wirken Law Group, P.C.. Defendant's attorney: Michael P. Joyce and Kevin E. Glynn of Van Osdol, Magruder, Erickson.
When was Gary Brown vs. Arnold Day, Defendant Ad Litem for Leary S... decided?
This case was decided on August 7, 2007.