Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
GERALD PARSONS vs. STATE OF MISSOURI
Date: 05-18-2019
Case Number: ED106367
Judge:
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Plaintiff's Attorney: Daniel N. McPherson
Defendant's Attorney: Richard H. Sindel
Description:
This post-conviction-relief case arose out of an incident in which Gerald Parsons, while intoxicated, crashed his vehicle into a stationary police vehicle injuring the officer inside. Parsons was charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI) and second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, both class B felonies which carried punishment ranges of five to 15 years in prison. After plea negotiations failed, Parsons entered blind guilty pleas to both charges and received concurrent sentences of 12 years on each conviction. Later, it was determined that the DWI charge was an included offense of the assault charge and, therefore, the guilty plea on the DWI charge violated Parsons’s constitutional right against double jeopardy. Parsons was permitted to withdraw his guilty plea to the DWI charge and that charge was dismissed, but his guilty plea and 12-year sentence on the assault charge remained in place. Parsons now appeals the denial following an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief based on allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel. He contends that the motion court clearly erred when it found he was not prejudiced by his counsel’s failure to recognize the double jeopardy situation presented by the two charges and counsel’s advice that he plead guilty to both charges.
This post-conviction-relief case arose out of an incident in which Gerald Parsons, while intoxicated, crashed his vehicle into a stationary police vehicle injuring the officer inside. Parsons was charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI) and second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, both class B felonies which carried punishment ranges of five to 15 years in prison. After plea negotiations failed, Parsons entered blind guilty pleas to both charges and received concurrent sentences of 12 years on each conviction. Later, it was determined that the DWI charge was an included offense of the assault charge and, therefore, the guilty plea on the DWI charge violated Parsons’s constitutional right against double jeopardy. Parsons was permitted to withdraw his guilty plea to the DWI charge and that charge was dismissed, but his guilty plea and 12-year sentence on the assault charge remained in place. Parsons now appeals the denial following an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief based on allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel. He contends that the motion court clearly erred when it found he was not prejudiced by his counsel’s failure to recognize the double jeopardy situation presented by the two charges and counsel’s advice that he plead guilty to both charges.
Outcome:
REVERSED AND REMANDED
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of GERALD PARSONS vs. STATE OF MISSOURI?
The outcome was: REVERSED AND REMANDED
Which court heard GERALD PARSONS vs. STATE OF MISSOURI?
This case was heard in Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District, MO.
Who were the attorneys in GERALD PARSONS vs. STATE OF MISSOURI?
Plaintiff's attorney: Daniel N. McPherson. Defendant's attorney: Richard H. Sindel.
When was GERALD PARSONS vs. STATE OF MISSOURI decided?
This case was decided on May 18, 2019.