Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Gale Allen Rachuy
Date: 12-13-2023
Case Number:
Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Court: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Minneapolis
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Minneapolis Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Minneapolis, Minnesota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraud.
In March 2022, Gale Allen Rachuy, 73, defrauded Victim A (victim), by falsely representing that Rachuy was an attorney who could handle the victim's legal proceedings. As part of the scheme, Rachuy told the victim that he would be able to get former federal and state court judges to work on the victim's case. In order to retain the alleged judges, Rachuy would need the victim to pay a retainer fee of $10,000, with the first payment of $2,500 due on March 15, 2022. Rachuy and the victim each signed a retainer agreement, which specified that both judges would be assisting in the victim's legal representation. On March 15, 2022, the victim paid the $2,500 retainer fee via wire from his account in Fayetteville, Arkansas, to Rachuy's bank account in Minneapolis. The victim was scheduled to wire another $2,500 installment to Rachuy on April 1, 2022, but became suspicious of Rachuy after not seeing any drafts or filings in his case. After the victim realized that Rachuy was fraudulently representing these services, he ceased making future payments. Despite assuring the victim that the funds would be returned, Rachuy never returned the funds.
Rachuy pleaded guilty on May 10, 2023, to one count of wire fraud.
This case is the result of an investigation conducted by the FBI.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Chelsea A. Walcker and Harry M. Jacobs prosecuted the case.
In March 2022, Gale Allen Rachuy, 73, defrauded Victim A (victim), by falsely representing that Rachuy was an attorney who could handle the victim's legal proceedings. As part of the scheme, Rachuy told the victim that he would be able to get former federal and state court judges to work on the victim's case. In order to retain the alleged judges, Rachuy would need the victim to pay a retainer fee of $10,000, with the first payment of $2,500 due on March 15, 2022. Rachuy and the victim each signed a retainer agreement, which specified that both judges would be assisting in the victim's legal representation. On March 15, 2022, the victim paid the $2,500 retainer fee via wire from his account in Fayetteville, Arkansas, to Rachuy's bank account in Minneapolis. The victim was scheduled to wire another $2,500 installment to Rachuy on April 1, 2022, but became suspicious of Rachuy after not seeing any drafts or filings in his case. After the victim realized that Rachuy was fraudulently representing these services, he ceased making future payments. Despite assuring the victim that the funds would be returned, Rachuy never returned the funds.
Rachuy pleaded guilty on May 10, 2023, to one count of wire fraud.
This case is the result of an investigation conducted by the FBI.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Chelsea A. Walcker and Harry M. Jacobs prosecuted the case.
Outcome:
He was sentenced to 21 months in prison.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Gale Allen Rachuy?
The outcome was: He was sentenced to 21 months in prison.
Which court heard United States of America v. Gale Allen Rachuy?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County), MN. The presiding judge was Joan N. Ericksen.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Gale Allen Rachuy?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Minneapolis. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Minneapolis Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Gale Allen Rachuy decided?
This case was decided on December 13, 2023.