Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Todd Allen Stafford

Date: 09-11-2026

Case Number: 2:23-CR-0010

Judge: Jane M. Beckering

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan (Kent County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: John J. Sehoettle

Defendant's Attorney: Britt Cobb

Description:
Grand Rapids, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with engaging in exual activity with a 15-year-old boy (“M.V.”) whom he met through an online dating app. in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2422.

On April 28, 2023, Todd Stafford and minor male M.V. began corresponding on an
online hookup and dating website. At the time, Mr. Stafford was 59. M.V.’s dating profile listed his age as 18, but in reality he was 15. According to M.V., he listed his age as 18 because that was “the lowest age [one] could select” on the website.

At the time, Mr. Stafford worked for the Navy with his primary duties being to serve as a
Navy representative at honors funerals for deceased service members. Mr. Stafford worked two such honors funerals in Green Bay, Wisconsin on April 28, 2023. He stayed in Iron Mountain, Michigan that night because he had family in the area.

While in Iron Mountain that evening, Mr. Stafford reached out to M.V. via the hookup
app and the two began exchanging messages. They discussed their sexual interests, and Mr. Stafford suggested that they meet up at his hotel so that he could give M.V. a massage. The two agreed to meet the next morning, and at 9:00 am on April 29, 2023, Mr. Stafford picked M.V. up at a pre-arranged meeting spot and drove him back to the hotel. M.V. had asked Mr. Stafford to pick him up, stating that his car was not working. In reality, M.V. could not drive to their meeting because he did not have a license. Once at the hotel, Mr. Stafford and M.V. undressed to their underwear, and Mr. Stafford gave M.V. a massage. Around 10:00 am, Mr. Stafford drove M.V. back to their prearranged meeting spot.
Outcome:
A jury found the Defendant guilty.

Affirmed on appeal.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Todd Allen Stafford?

The outcome was: A jury found the Defendant guilty. Affirmed on appeal.

Which court heard United States of America v. Todd Allen Stafford?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan (Kent County), MI. The presiding judge was Jane M. Beckering.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Todd Allen Stafford?

Plaintiff's attorney: John J. Sehoettle. Defendant's attorney: Britt Cobb.

When was United States of America v. Todd Allen Stafford decided?

This case was decided on September 11, 2026.