Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Michigan v. Christopher Schurr
Date: 05-22-2025
Case Number:
Judge: Christina Mims
Court: Circuit Court, Kent County, Michigan
Plaintiff's Attorney: Kent County Michigan District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Grand Rapids Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Grand Rapids, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with murder.
Christopher Schurr, age 36, was accused of killing Patrick Lyoya in 2022.
Mr. Lyoya's death heightened racial tensions in Michigan amid a national debate over racism and police misconduct after the killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.
Mr. Lyoya's death heightened racial tensions in Michigan amid a national debate over racism and police misconduct after the killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.
Christopher Schurr, age 36, was accused of killing Patrick Lyoya in 2022.
Mr. Lyoya's death heightened racial tensions in Michigan amid a national debate over racism and police misconduct after the killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.
Mr. Lyoya's death heightened racial tensions in Michigan amid a national debate over racism and police misconduct after the killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.
Outcome:
Mistrial.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Michigan v. Christopher Schurr?
The outcome was: Mistrial.
Which court heard State of Michigan v. Christopher Schurr?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Kent County, Michigan, MI. The presiding judge was Christina Mims.
Who were the attorneys in State of Michigan v. Christopher Schurr?
Plaintiff's attorney: Kent County Michigan District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Grand Rapids Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was State of Michigan v. Christopher Schurr decided?
This case was decided on May 22, 2025.