Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Michigan v. James and Jennifer Crumbley
Date: 11-16-2023
Case Number:
Judge:
Court: Circuit Court, Oakland County, Michigan
Plaintiff's Attorney: Oakland County Michigan District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney: Paulette Loftin and Shannon Smith
Description:
Troy, Michigan criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with involuntary manslaughter for given their son a firearm that he used to shoot and kill students at Oxford school in 2021.
According to court records, the psychiatrist had written in her notes that Ethan Crumbley told her he didn't ask his parents for a therapist. This is different from what the therapist wrote in a competency report and testified to during a court proceeding, when she said he asked for help.
The State claims that the parent of Ethan Crumbly were criminally negligence in buying their son a gun.
According to court records, the psychiatrist had written in her notes that Ethan Crumbley told her he didn't ask his parents for a therapist. This is different from what the therapist wrote in a competency report and testified to during a court proceeding, when she said he asked for help.
The State claims that the parent of Ethan Crumbly were criminally negligence in buying their son a gun.
Outcome:
Going to trial in 2024.
Going to trial in 2024.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Michigan v. James and Jennifer Crumbley?
The outcome was: Going to trial in 2024.
Which court heard State of Michigan v. James and Jennifer Crumbley?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Oakland County, Michigan, MI.
Who were the attorneys in State of Michigan v. James and Jennifer Crumbley?
Plaintiff's attorney: Oakland County Michigan District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Paulette Loftin and Shannon Smith.
When was State of Michigan v. James and Jennifer Crumbley decided?
This case was decided on November 16, 2023.