Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Nathan Pease v. Wyman's, Cherryfield Food and Allen's
Date: 11-19-2003
Case Number: Unknown
Judge: Unknown
Court: Superior Court, Knox County, Maine
Plaintiff's Attorney: William Robitzek of Berman & Simmons, P.A., Portland, Maine
Defendant's Attorney: Unknown
Description:
Maine blueberry growers claimed that defendant processors conspired to drive down the prices of blueberrys. The growers accused the processors of conspiracy to set low field prices for the state's blueberry crop from 1996 to 1999.
Outcome:
Plaintiffs' verdict for $19 million.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
None
About This Case
What was the outcome of Nathan Pease v. Wyman's, Cherryfield Food and Allen's?
The outcome was: Plaintiffs' verdict for $19 million.
Which court heard Nathan Pease v. Wyman's, Cherryfield Food and Allen's?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Knox County, Maine, ME. The presiding judge was Unknown.
Who were the attorneys in Nathan Pease v. Wyman's, Cherryfield Food and Allen's?
Plaintiff's attorney: William Robitzek of Berman & Simmons, P.A., Portland, Maine. Defendant's attorney: Unknown.
When was Nathan Pease v. Wyman's, Cherryfield Food and Allen's decided?
This case was decided on November 19, 2003.