Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Thiago De Souza Prado
Date: 07-11-2025
Case Number:
Judge: Mark L. Wolfe
Court: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Suffolk County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Boston
Defendant's Attorney: James Mason
Description:
Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with - 2 -
AFRAME, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Thiago de Souza with wire fraud and aggravated identity theft.
The case arose from a scheme to defraud rideshare and food delivery companies and, to further that
scheme, steal or misappropriate the identities of third parties.
Prado was born in Brazil. In 2003, Prado entered the United States on a tourist visa, but he is not presently authorized to be in the country. In January 2019, Prado began participating in the criminal scheme for which he was convicted. A network of Brazilian nationals living in the United States carried out the scheme by creating and using fraudulent accounts so as to permit ineligible individuals to drive for Uber, Uber Eats, Lyft, DoorDash, Instacart, and Grubhub. Prado was himself ineligible to drive for these companies because he had numerous disqualifying driving infractions; others were ineligible because, among other reasons, they were not legally authorized to work.
AFRAME, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Thiago de Souza with wire fraud and aggravated identity theft.
The case arose from a scheme to defraud rideshare and food delivery companies and, to further that
scheme, steal or misappropriate the identities of third parties.
Prado was born in Brazil. In 2003, Prado entered the United States on a tourist visa, but he is not presently authorized to be in the country. In January 2019, Prado began participating in the criminal scheme for which he was convicted. A network of Brazilian nationals living in the United States carried out the scheme by creating and using fraudulent accounts so as to permit ineligible individuals to drive for Uber, Uber Eats, Lyft, DoorDash, Instacart, and Grubhub. Prado was himself ineligible to drive for these companies because he had numerous disqualifying driving infractions; others were ineligible because, among other reasons, they were not legally authorized to work.
Outcome:
A jury convicted the Defendant.
Affirmed
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Thiago De Souza Prado?
The outcome was: A jury convicted the Defendant. Affirmed
Which court heard United States of America v. Thiago De Souza Prado?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Suffolk County), MA. The presiding judge was Mark L. Wolfe.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Thiago De Souza Prado?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Boston. Defendant's attorney: James Mason.
When was United States of America v. Thiago De Souza Prado decided?
This case was decided on July 11, 2025.