Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Sharn Parzival
Date: 02-06-2025
Case Number:
Judge: Richard G. Stearns
Court: The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Plaintiff's Attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for Boston
Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Boston, Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Making False Statements in an Application for a U.S. Passport and to Federal Agents
Indian National Sentenced for Making False Statements in an Application for a U.S. Passport and to Federal Agents
An Indian national living in Chelsea, Mass. was sentenced yesterday in federal court in Boston for making false statements in an application for a U.S. passport and making false statements to federal agents.
Sharn Parzival, 25, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns to time served (approximately five months) and one year of supervised release. Parzival is subject to deportation. In December 2024, Parzival pleaded guilty to an Information.
On Jan. 31, 2023, Parzival submitted an application for a U.S. passport at a post office in Somerville, Mass. In the application he claimed to have been born in Maryland and declared under penalty of perjury that he was a citizen or national of the United States. As proof of identity and citizenship, Parzival submitted copies of a Massachusetts driver's license and a purported Maryland birth certificate. The investigation revealed, however, that Parzival had entered the country in 2021 from India on a non-immigrant student Visa but had thereafter been expelled by the school he was attending. Further investigation revealed that the birth certificate was fraudulent and that Maryland had never issued a birth certificate in Parzival's name.
On April 26, 2023, Parzival went to the office of the U.S. Department of State (DOS) in Boston to inquire about the status of his passport application. He agreed to be interviewed by DOS agents and made a number of false statements, including that he had been born in Maryland, that he had no affiliation with India and that he had never applied for a Visa. A fingerprint analyst subsequently compared Parzival's fingerprints to fingerprints that he provided when he applied for the Visa in India and concluded that they matched.
United States Attorney Leah B. Foley and Matthew O'Brien, Special Agent in Charge of U.S. Department of State's Diplomatic Security Service, Boston Field Office made the announcement. Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert E. Richardson of the Major Crimes Unit prosecuted the case.
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Sharn Parzival?
The outcome was:
Which court heard United States of America v. Sharn Parzival?
This case was heard in The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, MA. The presiding judge was Richard G. Stearns.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Sharn Parzival?
Plaintiff's attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for Boston. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Boston, Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Sharn Parzival decided?
This case was decided on February 6, 2025.