Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
MARY KAY GRANT, JOHN GRANT, JOHN GRANT as Administrator of the Estate of Christopher Grant and as Parent and Next Friend of Christopher Grant, and DEBORAH HOWARD v. JAMES SCHRAND, M.D.;, MARK SANDER, M.D.; and HESS, SCHRAND & SANDE
Date: 07-02-1999
Case Number: 92-CI-00256 and 92-CI-00674
Judge: Joseph Bamberger
Court: Circuit Court, Boone County, Kentucky
Plaintiff's Attorney: Gerald F. Dusing and
Chandra S. Baldwin of Adams, Brooking, Stepner, Woltermann & Dusing, P.L.L.C., Covington, Kentucky
Defendant's Attorney: Mark G. Arnzen and
Mary K. Molloy of Arnzen, Parry & Wentz, P.S.C., Covington, Kentucky
Sander for many years. Her initial complaint in the early 1980's
was of migraine headaches, and she was given injections of
Demerol in the doctors' offices to relieve her pain. Howard later
developed interstitial cystitis, and Demerol was again used
to manage this painful condition and was administered by a
patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump during her
hospitalizations. Howard's pain worsened to the point where Dr.
Sander prescribed Demerol to be self-administered by a PCA pump
for her use at home in July 1991.
Howard continued to work as a deputy circuit clerk in Boone
County after receiving the pump. On August 29, 1991, Dr. Schrand
was informed by a nurse from Olsten Home Health Care, Inc.
(Olsten), who had been summoned to the courthouse where Howard
worked, that Howard was suspected of overdosing on Demerol.
Olsten was a nursing service that had been employed to maintain
the PCA pump, to change the cassettes which held the medication,
to check to see that the pump was working properly, and to adjust
the dosages when ordered to do so by the doctors. Dr. Schrand
then spoke with Howard by telephone and advised her to go to a
hospital. Howard declined to do so on the ground that she feared
she would lose her job if she missed more work. Dr. Schrand then
allowed Howard to go home.
Arrangements were made whereby the nurse would drive Howard
home. However, once Howard and the nurse reached the parking lot,
Howard insisted that she be allowed to drive her vehicle home.
The nurse allowed her to do so and stated that she would follow
her home and check her again. While driving herself home,
Howard's vehicle collided with a vehicle being driven by Mary Kay
Grant in which her twelve-year-old son, Christopher
Grant, was a passenger. Christopher was killed in
the collision, and Mary Kay was severely injured. Mary Kay, her
husband, and Christopher's estate later filed suit against the
doctors, the nurse, Olsten, Howard, and others.
found the doctors to be fifty percent (50%) responsible for the
Grants' injuries, Howard to be twenty-five percent (25%)
responsible, and Olsten and another home health service to be
twenty-five percent (25%) responsible. The amount of the verdict is unknown at this time.
About This Case
What was the outcome of MARY KAY GRANT, JOHN GRANT, JOHN GRANT as Administrator o...?
The outcome was: The found the doctors to be fifty percent (50%) responsible for the Grants' injuries, Howard to be twenty-five percent (25%) responsible, and Olsten and another home health service to be twenty-five percent (25%) responsible. The amount of the verdict is unknown at this time.
Which court heard MARY KAY GRANT, JOHN GRANT, JOHN GRANT as Administrator o...?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Boone County, Kentucky, KY. The presiding judge was Joseph Bamberger.
Who were the attorneys in MARY KAY GRANT, JOHN GRANT, JOHN GRANT as Administrator o...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Gerald F. Dusing and Chandra S. Baldwin of Adams, Brooking, Stepner, Woltermann & Dusing, P.L.L.C., Covington, Kentucky. Defendant's attorney: Mark G. Arnzen and Mary K. Molloy of Arnzen, Parry & Wentz, P.S.C., Covington, Kentucky.
When was MARY KAY GRANT, JOHN GRANT, JOHN GRANT as Administrator o... decided?
This case was decided on July 2, 1999.