Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Dalton Christopher Brewer v. Lawrence Hodge, Tony Ramey, Whitley County Sheriff Department and Whitley County, Kentucky

Date: 11-13-2010

Case Number: 6:08-cv-00183-GFVT-HAI

Judge: Gregory F. Van Tatenhove

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky (Jefferson County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Michael Todd Cooper and Hal D. Friedman, Cooper & Friedman, P.L.L.C., Louisville, Kentucky and James M. Burd, Stewart Stimmel, L.L.P., Louisville, Kentucky

Defendant's Attorney: Janes Winkler Dyche and R. W. Dyche, London, Kentucky for Whitley County, Kentucky, Sheriff Lawrence Hodge

Description:
Dalton Brewer, age 27, sued Tony Ramey and Whitley County on a civil rights violation theories claimed that he was injured when a volunteer Whitley County Sheriff's Deputy beat him with a pistol. He claimed that Tony Ramey sued excessive force.



The defenses asserted by defendants are not available.
Outcome:
Plaintiff's verdict for $6.8 million.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Dalton Christopher Brewer v. Lawrence Hodge, Tony Ramey, ...?

The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $6.8 million.

Which court heard Dalton Christopher Brewer v. Lawrence Hodge, Tony Ramey, ...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky (Jefferson County), KY. The presiding judge was Gregory F. Van Tatenhove.

Who were the attorneys in Dalton Christopher Brewer v. Lawrence Hodge, Tony Ramey, ...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Michael Todd Cooper and Hal D. Friedman, Cooper & Friedman, P.L.L.C., Louisville, Kentucky and James M. Burd, Stewart Stimmel, L.L.P., Louisville, Kentucky. Defendant's attorney: Janes Winkler Dyche and R. W. Dyche, London, Kentucky for Whitley County, Kentucky, Sheriff Lawrence Hodge.

When was Dalton Christopher Brewer v. Lawrence Hodge, Tony Ramey, ... decided?

This case was decided on November 13, 2010.